Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Pomidor Quixote
Daily Stormer
May 21, 2019
“Why would she be crying if what she says isn’t true?”
Women’s feelings are the only proof needed to condemn a man. In fact, women’s feelings are such powerful proofs that they take precedence over objective proofs like video recordings that show their feelings are wrong.
You have to understand… this is current year, and in current year, women’s feelings are never wrong.
A former Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism alleged in a lawsuit filed Monday in Manhattan Federal Court that he recorded an encounter with a woman who would come to accuse him of rape, after she tried to perform oral sex on him and bit him when he refused her sexual advances.
Ben Feibleman is suing Columbia for “grievously” mishandling a sexual assault allegation against him from a fellow student. The university expelled him for the October 2016 incident, which took place while he was attending the graduate school of journalism.
This is the lawsuit: Feibleman v. The Trustees of Columbia University In The City of New York.
The woman did not report the assault to police but reported it to faculty a week after it allegedly took place, according to the lawsuit.
That’s the first sign the woman is making shit up. If it were serious, she’d go to the police. Just like if all of those #MeToo lies were real, the women would’ve gone to the police right after the events allegedly happened instead of baiting the internet for attention or making it public in any form of media.
Real rape survivors tend to avoid bringing lots of attention to themselves.
Feibleman, who accused Columbia of “anti-male” gender bias in the suit, claimed the female student was the real aggressor. According to him, the unnamed alleged victim pulled his face into her breasts following an “hours long” flirtation, the New York Post reported. Consensual kissing and fondling took place in the student’s room, Feibleman claimed. He rejected her frequent attempts to get him to engage in sex, citing the fact that the woman was currently in a relationship with another man.
“Please because I can’t let you go without it,” the woman reportedly said, referencing sex.
The alleged victim berated Feibleman, according to the lawsuit, leading him to make a 30-minute phone recording of the encounter while he was in the woman’s room.
But despite the recorded evidence that Feibleman alleged proved he had not assaulted the woman, Columbia investigators determined he was responsible. The school found that the female student was unable to consent because she was too drunk.
GUISE SHE DIDN’T CONSENT!
She didn’t consent to him not having sex with her. She didn’t consent to him recording her. She didn’t consent to him disagreeing with her. She didn’t consent to kissing him while drunk because DUH – she was drunk!
Kissing a drunk woman that pulls your face to her breasts and literally BEGS YOU to put your penis in any of her holes is illegal because alcohol and uh… power dynamics.
Okay?
This whole consent thing is getting out of control. The effects are clearly devastating to random innocent men even when they try to do what’s supposed to be the right thing for current year males and not have sex with women.
Following the road we’re currently on, even talking with drunk women could become a crime because they could tell you stuff they wouldn’t tell you while sober, which means they didn’t consent to speaking the words they spoke to you while drunk, which in turn means you’re going to jail for raping her speech.
The slippery slope is real and if we don’t get out of the slope we’re gonna keep slipping.
