Hillary Kookton: If Obama Would Have Sent More Money to ISIS, ISIS Wouldn’t Exist

Daily Stormer
August 12, 2014

"These terrorists need more shekels from American taxpayers." -Hillary Clinton, confirmed kook and next President
“These terrorists need more shekels from American taxpayers.” -Hillary Clinton, confirmed kook and next President

It is the general policy of politicians to make statements which make no basic sense at all.  Hillary Clinton, however, on the campaign trail, is taking this practice to a whole new level of weirdness.

NBC:

In an interview with The Atlantic, Hillary Clinton made her strongest statements yet differentiating her foreign policy views from the president’s, saying that his “failure” to aid Syrian rebels resulted in the rise of ISIS.The failure to help build up a credible fighting force of the people who were the originators of the protests against Assad—there were Islamists, there were secularists, there was everything in the middle—the failure to do that left a big vacuum, which the jihadists have now filled,” she said in the interview with Jeffrey Goldberg. And here’s what she said about Obama’s informal foreign-policy doctrine: “Great nations need organizing principles, and ‘Don’t do stupid stuff’ is not an organizing principle.” With the president’s foreign policy approval rating at 36% in the latest NBC/WSJ poll, it’s logical to see Clinton starting to distance herself this sharply from her former boss. But it’s also worth noting that she has always been more hawkish than the president; remember, it was her Iraq vote that largely boosted the more dovish Obama to victory in the 2008 primary. And her disagreement with Obama over arming the Syrian rebels is documented in her own book, so while she may be using harsher language on this point, this isn’t a major reversal for the former secretary of state.

Yes, you read that correctly.  This dyke wench is saying that if Obama would have sent more money to the people who formed ISIS, ISIS would not exist.

Obama was openly and admittedly funding the Syrian “rebels” (foreign terrorists) against Assad, and it is from this massive influx of cash that real crazies were able to form a new hardcore terrorist organization.  If Obama had sent more money, as the crazy terrorist-supporter Hillary says he should have, all that would presumably mean is that ISIS would have even more money than they presently do.

But Hillary, like all other American politicians, believes more war is always the answer to wars.

What sort of a world do we live in, where people like this are promoted by the media as saviors of the nation?