Hoaxology: Man in Fedora and Plaid Suit Says No Evidence in Skripal Case

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
March 29, 2018

George Galloway is not really the sort of person you can take seriously anymore, as he basically is a full-on Russian shill who doesn’t even try to be subtle about it. And actually, he isn’t that good at it (if he was good at it, he would be more subtle).

Even worse than being a shameless Russian shill is wearing a fedora and a plaid suit. Because why.

Nonetheless, he does make some good points sometimes.

RT:

Politicians’ words must not be taken at face value as trust in them has eroded, George Galloway has said, as he hit out at the UK for failing to produce evidence to the public of Russia’s alleged involvement in the Skripal case.

As the US and other countries expel scores of Russian diplomats to back Prime Minister Theresa May’s sanctioning of Moscow over its alleged “culpability” in the poisoning of former double agent Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia, former Labour MP Galloway told RT that they are doing so without a “slither of evidence.”

“Nobody knows who is guilty. No one has been shown a scintilla, a slither of evidence showing who did this or even what it was that happened. Both of these are open questions and none of us have been given any evidence, and all of us are being asked to take on trust the word of a British PM on an issue of chemical weapons.”

Citing former Labour Prime Minister Tony Blair’s “mountain of lies about chemical weapons in Iraq,” Galloway said: “I no longer take any politicians word to face value. I demand to see evidence.”

None of the countries which have joined May in her condemnation of Russia are basing their allegations on facts, according to Galloway. “None of them are going by evidence. All of them are going by the false assertion that the weapon that was used against these two individuals in Salisbury was a Russian weapon made in Russia, produced illegally in Russia and delivered by someone working for Russia. There is not a slither of evidence for any of that and in truth anyone who states it is lying.”

It’s so nutty that there literally is no evidence at all, other than “it’s a Russian chemical.”

And obviously, the Russians would know that. So why would they use that chemical?

Let me tell you something, which should be obvious:

Virtually every person on the planet has loved ones. And someone who has the ability to try to assassinate you with a chemical weapon has the ability to get to those loved ones. Someone who could do that could break into your house at night, and be there when you turn the light on, and show you a live stream of your loved ones, and say they will be raped, tortured and killed if you don’t hang yourself/shoot yourself/jump out the window.

Or, if you for some reason don’t have loved ones, you’re probably an extremely self-centered person, and they can threaten to torture you to death if you don’t hang yourself/shoot yourself/jump out the window. Or threaten to expose secret information about you.

Furthermore, there are hundreds of ways to kill a person and make it look like an accident.

You can also shoot someone in the head or stab them to death on the street, make it look like a “robbery gone wrong.” Not hard to explain that in a country with blacks.

So basically, the only reason you would use a Russian chemical to kill someone is if you wanted to make it look like the Russians did it. That is true for whoever did it, including the Russians.

That is to say: if the Russians did do it, they wanted to make it look like they did it.

So if the Theresa May et al. theory is that the Russians did this and wanted everyone to know that they did this, then within that theory needs to be included why the Russians would do this and want everyone to know that they did this.

What do they gain from this?

If their goal was to have the whole world attacking them and isolating them – which would have been their only possible goal, as it was the only possible outcome – then the West is just playing into the hands of Russia by doing that.

And if Russia is playing multi-dimensional chess at that level, well… then we need someone other than Theresa May making the decisions about how to handle this situation.

Honestly, this is all so dumb, I find it emotionally exhausting to even think about.