Horsefaced Old Bitch is Back, Demanding a Total Shutdown of Free Speech!

Jacinda hit the wall like a lone horse charging a well-prepared infantry line

You thought this cunt would disappear after she got voted out?

Not likely!

She is like a lingering disease!

Like all women, she will nag and nag and nag until her dying breath!

Reuters:

Former New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern will help tackle violent extremism online and will also be on the board of an environmental prize set up by Prince William as she looks ahead to a life after politics.

Ardern stepped down as prime minister in January saying she had “no more in the tank” to lead the country and would also not seek re-election to parliament. She is due to give her final speech in parliament on Wednesday.

Ardern, who became the youngest female leader in the world when she won power in 2017 at the age of 37, will serve as an unpaid special envoy for the Christchurch Call, an initiative she co-founded in 2019 to bring together countries and technology companies to combat extremism, the government said.

That just means mass censorship of people who disagree with the government.

This is so ridiculous, that they just keep coming up with new euphemisms and apparently there is some group of people that is fooled by it.

Anything they say about “extremism” or “violence” or “hate speech” or any of these other buzzwords always means silencing people who disagree with them. Period.

Attacks on two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand’s second-largest city, in March 2019 killed 51 people dead and wounded 40. The white supremacist gunman who carried out the assault live-streamed part of it on Facebook.

“The Christchurch Call is a foreign policy priority for the government and Jacinda Ardern is uniquely placed to keep pushing forward with the goal of eliminating violent extremist content online,” her replacement as prime minister, Chris Hipkins, said in a statement.

“Terrorist and violent extremist content online is a global issue, but for many in New Zealand it is also very personal.”

With regards to Brenton Tarrant, they were never able to point to any “violent” or “extremist” content that caused him to do that shooting. Basically, he just decided that this would be the best way to deal with the race replacement issue. I obviously disagree, but it is what it is – he’s just a person who made a decision.

Anti-Social People Will Do Anti-Social Things

In order to stop that from happening, you would have to make it illegal for people to talk about the fact that whites are being replaced in their own countries – and that is in fact exactly what they’re saying: if the things the government is doing make people angry, no one should be legally allowed to talk about what the government is doing (unless they say it is good).

Aotearoa New Zealand is committed to working with others to raise ambition and maintain momentum on the Christchurch Call to eliminate terrorist and extremist violent content online. https://t.co/OkzmD6XVox

— New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs & Trade (@MFATNZ) April 4, 2023

Of course, an f-to-m just shot up a Christian school because she thought there was a “genocide” happening against trannies. No one is going to say this shouldn’t be allowed, which proves that this is not actually about silencing any speech that could potentially lead to violence, but rather silencing criticism of the government.

Of course, “any speech that could lead to violence” would be meaningless, even if you included the tranny stuff. The guy who killed John Lennon was “radicalized” by the “extremism” in the Jew novel “The Catcher in the Rye.” In fact, that book is linked to several other high profile shootings.

So what are you going to do? Ban novels?

People who do mass shootings have personal problems. They are anti-social. It has nothing to do with whatever content they are reading. If they take that as “inspiration,” they would have taken something else as inspiration instead. Yes, anti-social people are typically drawn to the far-right or the far-left, but again – The Catcher in the Rye (an extremely anti-social Jewish novel) is out there if people don’t hit on some political thing.

Censorship Makes It Worse

With the right-wing shootings, you often do have real issues involved, however. It is still going to be down to personal problems that someone goes and does a mass shooting of strangers, but there are real social problems you could deal with to try and lessen these events.

Ironically, the vast majority of the right-wing shootings have happened after this program of mass censorship began. You could certainly argue that if someone is already unstable, and they start reading about problems happening in the world and then find that it is de facto illegal for them to speak publicly about their grievances, that this is going to drastically increase the likelihood of a violent outburst.

Certainly, less speech is not going to lead to less violence – the entire purpose of free speech is to give people an outlet to voice their concerns instead of resorting to violence. If people feel they can speak freely and have their voices heard, they are much less likely to feel there is no hope and the only way to be heard is by committing a large scale atrocity.

On some level, I’m sure that the people pushing for speech restrictions know that this will increase the likelihood of political violence. Then, more violence allows them to do more speech restriction.

And Another Thing…

The majority of these acts of large scale violence – against strangers – happen in America. At least the non-Islamic ones happen in America.

And many of them are very suspicious. Apparently, you have to pay the Jews billions of dollars if you question it, but the fact is, there are a lot of questions about Sandy Hook.

You can watch this documentary for a summary of some of those questions.

You can go on down the list. With the Stoneman-Douglas shooting, the FBI had been repeatedly warned that the kid had guns and was planning a shooting and they refused to act or even investigate, leading many to believe they wanted it to happen. You also had crisis actors at that school.

There are also a lot of suspicious things about many of the right-wing shooters. With the guy who shot up the black supermarket in Buffalo, it was more or less confirmed that the whole thing was arranged by the FBI. It came out that he had a federal agent in his Discord, and that the agent knew he was going to do the attack before it happened. In his “manifesto,” he also described someone grooming him for the shooting. Many people believe it to be likely that the federal agent and the groomer are the same person. Regardless, the story was dropped from the media like a hot potato as soon as it was revealed that there was a fed involved.

Conclusion

However you slice it, silencing freedom of speech does nothing to reduce violence, and it in fact likely increases this kind of violence.

The people in power want to silence criticism of their agenda. That’s all that is really happening here. It’s pretty straightforward.