Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Americans not only don’t know where Belarus is on a map, they don’t even know that it is a country. Yet Mike Pompeo has put overthrowing the government of Belarus based on a totally nonsensical “election fraud” hoax at the top of the American agenda, ten weeks before the most important election in the nation’s history.
Fellow disgusting fat slob Angela Merkel is getting in on the action, as is her weird pervert bellboy Emmanuel Macron. Yes, Belarus is in Europe, so maybe it is more relevant to the Germans or the French in theory than it should be to America. Merkel no doubt wants to open the country up for resource exploitation by German companies.
However, with both Pompeo and Merkel making such a big deal of bringing down Belarus, I’m at the point where I’m starting to wonder if this is not some kind of fat agenda against the fit and healthy Russians.
RT:
Russian President Vladimir Putin has told his German and French counterparts Angela Merkel and Emmanuel Macron that any attempt by outside forces to intervene in the political crisis in Belarus would be counterproductive.
In two separate phone calls on Tuesday, initiated by Berlin and Paris, Putin stressed that placing external pressure on the leadership in Minsk is unacceptable. Russia and Belarus have formal military and political alliances, via the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), the Eurasian Economic Union (EEU) and a ‘union state’ agreement.
According to the German side, Chancellor Merkel told Putin that Alexander Lukashenko’s government must stop using violence against peaceful demonstrators, enter into a dialogue with the opposition, and immediately release political prisoners.
The chancellor’s comments came amid various discussions among European Union members about how to address the situation in Belarus. EU ministers agreed last Friday to draw up a list of targets for a new round of sanctions, and politicians in Poland and Lithuania, and other states, have pushed for interventions, to various degrees.
“The parties thoroughly discussed the situation in Belarus following the presidential election,” the Kremlin statement read. “Russia pointed out that foreign attempts to interfere in the country’s domestic affairs were unacceptable and could further escalate tensions.”
“Hope was expressed that the situation will improve as soon as possible,” it concluded.
Later the same day, a second call took place with President Macron, in which Libya was also discussed.
“When discussing the complicated situation in Belarus, Vladimir Putin stressed that interference in the internal affairs of the republic and putting pressure on the Belarusian leadership would be unacceptable,” the Kremlin explained. “Both sides expressed a desire for an early solution to the problems that have arisen.”
Belarus is arguably Russia’s closest ally and is a full member of two Moscow-dominated alliances which serve as alternatives to the EU and NATO in Europe – the EEU and the CTSO, in addition to the ‘union state’ agreement.
By contrast with some of the rhetoric from Western Europe, the official response from Moscow has been measured. Numerous Russian experts have expressed the view that the Kremlin would prefer if the situation in Belarus did not become another ‘East versus West’ geopolitical struggle.
I’m sure they would prefer that, because the only side that ever wins these struggles is the West. It is totally impossible for Russia to ever come out on top in these situations, which is the reason that the West – in particular, the US and Germany – initiate these confrontations through their various underhanded means.
The initial fault of all of this is once again the fact that the people of the West have been trained to accept the premise that it is acceptable to meddle in the affairs of a foreign country in the name of inflicting morality on them. Whatever you believe about “democracy,” the way it is always framed as a moral imperative by the West is totally bizarre.
The foreign relations of any country should be based around what is beneficial for the people of the country, not attempting to impose a moral paradigm on other countries. That should simply be an obvious fact, but it isn’t any more, because we’ve spent decades harassing the world under the banner of grand moral superiority.
The reason for this is obviously primarily that we have women’s liberation and we’re a feminized society. The concept of “we have a duty to force morality on a foreign people” is only coherent in the estrogen-driven brain.
The pragmatic reality then is that it is a lot easier to cook up some moral crisis than it is to explain to the masses of people how a war, or an intervention, or whatever, benefits them, their family or their nation. While foreign adventurism is always going to be hard to explain in terms of necessity – especially for America, a country which is literally impossible to invade and has an invincible army – it’s always going to be easy to drum up some bullshit about incubator babies.
Or about how women just really want to be liberated from the patriarchy.
Or about how the people don’t have enough toilet paper.
Or about how freedom-loving gooks just want the right to burn old men alive if they’re yelling too loudly in a parking garage.
The fact that these people are now willing to say that an election won with 84% of the vote was somehow fraudulent is beyond the pale, but we’ve been on the other side of the pale for a bit now.
I guess people don’t really grasp just how difficult it would be to hold an internationally observed election and somehow come up with 84% when if you won – as Pompeo and the rest are claiming – less than 50%.
Election fraud exists, and sometimes you can push things over the edge, but the idea you can hoax 35% of the total vote is just utterly nonsensical, “Saddam did 911” tier gibberish for the lowest goyim.
The election did have international observers, by the way.
However – quite strangely – the ODIHR, the main international election-observing body in the world, rejected their invitation to observe!
As euronews reported in July, weeks before the election:
Last week, the OSCE’s Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR), an international body that assesses the fairness of elections, announced it was having to forego a planned mission to the eastern European country due to the invitation arriving too late.
“Belarus announced the forthcoming presidential election well over two months ago,” OSCE spokeswoman Katya Andrusz told Euronews.
“And the Belarusian authorities are aware that ODIHR needs a timely invitation in order to make a full assessment of the election process. The formation of election commissions and registration of candidates has already been completed, and these are specific areas ODIHR recently identified as requiring improvement.”
ODIHR published a statement announcing its withdrawal from the observation mission on July 15 because it hadn’t been formally invited. It was only then that Minsk sent an invitation, according to Andrusz.
It’s the first time ODIHR won’t be monitoring a Belarusian nationwide election since 2001.
They’ve been at every election since 2001, and didn’t call any of them fraudulent, but then they decided to skip this one because something something something they didn’t have time to prepare (?).
The Belarusian government complained about the fact they refused, of course.
It’s almost like the West was planning to claim this election was fraudulent long before it ever took place.
It’s obvious to anyone with a brain that this is exactly what happened.
We’ve got revolutions inside of our own countries. We’ve got revolutions in Hong Kong, Thailand, Lebanon and Belarus. These people are telling us with a straight face that it is just a coincidence that this is all happening at the same time, and that it’s happening during the middle of a fake “pandemic” which has completely transformed life across the entire world.
Does this make sense?
