Eric Striker
Daily Stormer
April 18, 2017
2017 will be known as the year of the stupid hoax. The “JCC bomb threats” and Sean Spicer observing the fact that Hitler never used gas are the the start. Now the Pentagon liars and media Jews are falling below InfoWars, credibility-wise, as mounting information begins to reveal Assad’s alleged sarin attack was a two-bit false flag.
Usually experts function as rent-a-credential to push establishment agendas, but in this case, the evidence for the gas attack being a staged ploy to lure the West into war against the legitimate government of Syria is great enough for one academic to speak up before another bogus WMD lie leads to war.
IBT:
A leading weapons academic has claimed that the Khan Sheikhoun nerve agent attack in Syria was staged, raising questions about who was responsible.
Theodore Postol, a professor emeritus at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), issued a series of three reports in response to the White House’s finding that Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad perpetrated the attack on 4 April.
Postol said: “I have reviewed the [White House’s] document carefully, and I believe it can be shown, without doubt, that the document does not provide any evidence whatsoever that the US government has concrete knowledge that the government of Syria was the source of the chemical attack in Khan Sheikhoun, Syria at roughly 6am to 7am on 4 April, 2017.“In fact, a main piece of evidence that is cited in the document point to an attack that was executed by individuals on the ground, not from an aircraft, on the morning of 4 April.
“This conclusion is based on an assumption made by the White House when it cited the source of the sarin release and the photographs of that source. My own assessment is that the source was very likely tampered with or staged, so no serious conclusion could be made from the photographs cited by the White House.”
The image Postol refers to is that of a crater containing a shell inside, which is said to have contained the sarin gas.
His analysis of the shell suggests that it could not have been dropped from an airplane as the damage of the casing is inconsistent from an aerial explosion. Instead, Postol said it was more likely that an explosive charge was laid upon the shell containing sarin, before being detonated.
…
Postol, formerly a scientific advisor at the Department of Defense (DoD), has previously outlined similar inconsistencies with US intelligence reports. Following the 2013 chemical weapons attack in eastern Ghouta, Postol again said the evidence did not suggest Assad was responsible.
A later United Nations report did not find Assad responsible also, however it did not rule him out either – as it could not apportion blame based on the evidence. Reporting by Seymour Hersh in the London Review of Books documented that US officials whitewashed findings to blame Assad when their intelligence showed that anti-Assad militants were the most likely perpetrators.
In his latest reports, Postol hit out at what he says is a “politicisation” of intelligence findings.
Postol said: “No competent analyst would miss the fact that the alleged sarin canister was forcefully crushed from above, rather than exploded by a munition within it.
The Jewish media continues to frame the attack as Assad thumbing his nose and challenging the West to attack him because he’s a demented maniac, but that makes no sense as the Syrian government continues to adamantly deny it committed this act.
As for the “conclusive intelligence,” President Trump and the US government have refused to release their supposed evidence showing Assad was behind the attack.
That is because their entire justification for pre-emptively striking the Syrian army airport was based entirely on images of this hole with a gas can in it. Weapon’s experts like Postol posit that the men in the video below in contact with it would’ve dropped dead on the spot:
This act of deep state appeasement could hold serious ramifications for the Trump administration. Both “left” and “right” Judenpresse clapped like seals as US government took an illegal gamble on sparking World War III with virtually nothing to gain, national security wise, but let’s see if they will stick with Trump once it comes out that the CIA and rebels staged this hoax together.