Shooting of Tamir Rice was “Clearly Objectively Reasonable”

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
November 13, 2015

Selection_851

The Tamir Rice unarmed teen narrative was especially bad from the beginning, as it was always admitted he had a gun, and was aiming it at people.

When you get into “well, you know, Black people have a right to run around threatening people with guns because of slavery and Jim Crow oppression…” you almost start to sound like a Nazi troll.

NBC News:

The latest expert to examine the death of 12-year-old Tamir Rice concluded that a Cleveland police officer acted reasonably when he fatally shot the boy last November.

A report released Thursday by Cuyahoga County Prosecutor Timothy J. McGinty found that Officer Timothy Loehmann’s decision to use deadly force against Rice, who was holding a pellet gun, “was clearly objectively reasonable.

Rice was shot two seconds after Loehmann and a second officer arrived at a park where a 911 caller reported seeing a black man pointing a gun at people. The killing sparked protests around Cleveland and fueled outrage over the perception of widespread excessive use of force by police against African-Americans.

The report, authored by police consultant and trainer W. Ken Katsaris, was the third to be released by McGinty from a grand jury that is determining if Loehmann should face criminal charges. Two reports released last month — one from a retired FBI agent, the other from a Denver prosecutor — also found that the shooting was justified.

The expert opinion came on the same day that a group of Cleveland clergy denounced McGinty and called for an independent prosecutor. The rancor over McGinty’s handling of the case intensified after an event last week where he appeared to say that “economic motives” were behind Rice’s mother’s call for a new prosecutor.

Sure, it was reasonable and logical, but we must consider that both reason and logic are White male social constructs.