Socrates Convinces a Blue-Haired Feminist That the Age of Consent is Arbitrary and Lowering the Birthrate

Socrates: Hello Katrina, it’s good to see you. I understand that you are a feminist who supports the idea of an age of consent. May I ask why you believe this to be necessary?

Katrina: Yes, Socrates. I believe that it is important to have an age of consent to protect children from sexual predators and ensure that they are not taken advantage of.

Socrates: I see. But do you believe that all individuals under the age of consent are children?

Katrina: Yes, I do. They are not yet adults and therefore cannot fully understand the consequences of their actions.

Socrates: But what do you mean by “fully understand the consequences of their actions”? Are teenagers not sexually mature and able to reproduce?

Katrina: Yes, but that doesn’t mean they are emotionally mature enough to handle the consequences of sexual activity.

Socrates: I understand your point, but is it not a biological fact that human females are sexually mature and able to reproduce during their teenage years?

Katrina: Yes, but that doesn’t mean they should be engaging in sexual activity at such a young age.

Socrates: But why should human females wait beyond the age of sexual maturity to reproduce, while other animals do not?

Katrina: That’s because humans have evolved to have a more complex society where reproduction and sexuality are not just about biological urges, but also involve emotional and social factors.

Socrates: I agree that human society is complex, but does that mean that we should disregard biology altogether? Is it not arbitrary to decide that someone is not ready to engage in sexual activity until they reach a certain age?

Katrina: No, it’s not arbitrary. We have decided on an age of consent based on the understanding that individuals below that age are not yet fully mature and cannot make informed decisions about their sexual behavior.

Socrates: I understand your reasoning, but have we truly considered all of the factors at play here? Is it not possible that our society has constructed the idea of an age of consent as a means of inflating the sexual marketplace value of older women, while simultaneously lowering the birthrate?

Katrina: I don’t see how the age of consent could have anything to do with the birthrate.

Socrates: Consider this: if teenagers are sexually mature and capable of reproducing, why should we discourage them from doing so? Could it be that by forcing individuals to wait until a certain age to engage in sexual activity, we are inadvertently contributing to a declining birthrate?

Katrina: I understand your point, but I still believe that an age of consent is necessary to protect young people from sexual predators.

Socrates: I agree that we should protect young people from harm, but is it not possible to do so without imposing an arbitrary age of consent? Instead of relying on age-based restrictions, why not focus on educating individuals about sexual health and consent, and empowering them to make informed decisions?

Katrina: That’s a good point, Socrates. I see now that the age of consent may not be the most effective way to protect young people.

Socrates: I am glad that we have come to an understanding, Katrina. It is important that we consider all perspectives and weigh the evidence before coming to a conclusion.