Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
European countries who invite millions of Moslems in and then attack and degrade their most sacred beliefs are not really doing something that makes logical sense.
Remember that Sweden was doing official government ceremonies for Korean burnings. Sorry, not Korean burnings. That might have some validity.
I meant to say “Koran burnings.”
See: Sweden Authorizes Another Koran Burning for Some Reason
The government was holding ceremonies to do these burnings, after they had invited millions of Moslems into their country. It really does not make a lot of sense to invite these people in and then start insulting them.
I guess you have to make it illegal, if you want all of those Moslems living in your country.
AP:
A Swedish court sentenced on Tuesday a far-right politician to four months in jail for two counts of “incitement against an ethnic group” after making hateful comments at political rallies two years ago.
The Danish-Swedish 42-year-old man, who was not named but has been identified by Swedish media as Rasmus Paludan, founder and head of the Danish nationalist anti-immigration party Stram Kurs, had been previously convicted and sentenced by a Danish court on a similar charge, the Malmo District Court said.
In 2022, Paludan made his offensive remarks directed at Muslims, Arabs and Africans during protests that he led in the southern city of Malmo in 2022, the court said. He also burned a copy of the Quran, Islam’s holy book, on at least one occasion. In response, a violent wave of riots swept the country.
Diversity is such a great strength that one dude can start massive riots in a few minutes.
Amazing.
The court in a statement Tuesday said Paludan’s remarks against Muslims “cannot be excused as criticism of Islam or as political campaign work.”
Chief Councilor Nicklas Söderberg, the court’s chairman, said: “It is permitted to publicly make critical statements about, for example, Islam and also Muslims, but the disrespect of a group of people must not clearly cross the line for a factual and valid discussion.”
What?
The line for… what?
He added that during the Malmo rallies in April and September 2022 “there was no question of any such discussion,” and that Paludan’s public statements “only amounted to insulting Muslims.”
The court took particular interest in whether the politician knew the protests were filmed and published on Facebook. Paludan had said that he wasn’t aware of it but the district court disagreed and said his “actions at the gatherings would be downright illogical if he didn’t know about the publication on Facebook.”
Personally, I don’t really think this is going to do anything positive. I don’t know what the goal is.
Why is this guy not talking about the Jews who brought all of these Moslems in?
Is it because it’s easier to whine about the immigrants themselves than to risk everything by going directly at the Jews?
Is there some other reason?
