The Push for a Black Spider-Man

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
February 11, 2015

ORLY?
ORLY?

Marvel Comics has been putting out some very profitable (and often well-done) films with their own studio for a number of years now, but the film rights to some of their most popular characters are owned by other studios – these include the rights to X-Men and Spider-Man – so these characters cannot be featured in the shared Marvel film universe.  Apparently, Marvel has now struck a deal with Sony, who owns the Spider-Man film rights, to allow Spider-Man to appear in their films.

So now, there is an argument being forwarded by the usual suspects that when this happens, the character should be portrayed as Black.

You can find dozens of articles about it on Google News.

Fans want new Spider-Man to black, Hispanic Miles Morales - Business Insider Twitter wants a black Spider-Man ASAP | Entertain This! Marvel's Next Cinematic Spider-Man Should Be a Black Guy

Without going into total nerd mode here, in the year 2000, Marvel launched something called the Ultimate Universe, a separate comics reality where the characters were “reimagined.” Unlike DC’s disastrous 2011 “New 52” revamp, this universe existed alongside the original universe, with stories published in the Ultimate Universe carrying the name “Ultimate” on their covers.

When I was a kid, "Black Spider-Man" meant something totally different.
When I was a kid, “Black Spider-Man” meant something totally different.

Ultimate Spider-Man was written by the Jewish hack Brian Michael Bendis.  Following a series of horrible creative decisions in the Ultimate Universe which basically destroyed it entirely, they began trying “edgy” maneuvers to try and make things interesting again.  One of these involved killing off the traditional Spider-Man character, the blue-eyed White man Peter Parker, created by the Slav Steve Ditko, and replacing him with a half-Negro, half-Latino boy named Mile Morales.

Wikipedia describes the origins of the character:

The concept of an African American Spider-Man was first discussed a few months before the November 2008 election of Barack Obama as President of the United States. Marvel Comics editor-in-chief Axel Alonso said, “We realized that we were standing at the brink of America electing its first African American President and we acknowledged that maybe it was time to take a good look at one of our icons”. This new Spider-Man was considered a possible part of the 2008-09 “Ultimatum” story arc that restructured much of the Ultimate Marvel universe, but those early thoughts were abandoned because the story for that character had not yet been developed. Bendis said thoughts about the character were further reinforced by African American actor Donald Glover’s appearance wearing Spider-Man pajamas in “Anthropology 101”, the second season premiere of the television comedy series Community. This was a reference to an unsuccessful online campaign that attempted to secure an audition for the lead role in the 2012 film The Amazing Spider-Man. Bendis said of Glover, “I saw him in the costume and thought, ‘I would like to read that book.’ So I was glad I was writing that book.”

The comic largely flopped, and ran for only two years before being cancelled (the previous Ultimate Spider-Man, with Parker, ran for nine years before being replaced with Ultimate Negro-Man). Though comic book fans tend to be artsy and thus liberlish, and supported the decision by Marvel, they are also almost entire White and so subconsciously were not driven to pick this Black Spider-Man’s book.

The character of Nick Fury was also replaced with a Black in the Ultimate Universe, and then played by Samuel L. Jackson in the films.

Original
Original
Ultimate
Ultimate
Film
Film

However, that was less offensive, as he was not a well-known iconic character, and he didn’t have to be killed-off to be replaced by a Black as Peter Parker was – in the Ultimate Universe, that reality’s version of him was just Black.  Also, from an artistic standpoint, it makes much more logical sense to have a largely amoral soldier-spy as a Black than a superhero.  The concept of a Black altruistically engaging in heroism is entirely nonsensical from the perspective of basic reality.  Especially one who helps White people – the vast majority of Black people wouldn’t save a White man from drowning.  Black heroes such as the Black Panther and Luke Cage made more sense, as they were exclusively devoted to helping other Blacks.

The current Spider-Man is a Jew.
The current Spider-Man is a Jew.

The deal with Marvel seems to have resulted from the utter failure of the recent Sony Spider-Man films, which featured an effeminate Jew, Andrew Garfield, as Spider-Man.  Garfield in an interview declared that Spider-Man was a Jew, on another occasion declaring that he would like to see the character engage in interracial gay anal sex in the sequel.  There was no Black-on-Jew man love in the sequel, but they did for whatever reason turn the villain Electro into a Black guy, played by Jamie Foxx.

Blacks with electric powers are a trope for some reason.
Blacks with electric powers are a trope for some reason.

Not Happening

Thankfully, this isn’t going to happen.

As everyone already knows Spider-Man as Peter Parker, the only way to introduce Mile Morales as Spider-Man would be to kill off Peter Parker.  And one thing I can say about the Marvel films: they’re feel-good.  They’re not going to kill a cultural icon, as they are not willing to sacrifice profit for diversity.

Following that, there won’t be any move in Hollywood to replace Whites with Blacks on a serious scale, as it has failed completely.  Everyone was all excited about the recent Annie film with a Black girl, then when it flopped SJWs called society racist for not paying $11 dollars to watch it.

If there's one thing people hate, it's Black Annie.
If there’s one thing people hate, it’s Black Annie.

Besides Will Smith, there aren’t any Black people that Whites want to watch as a lead character, and international audiences don’t even want to watch Will Smith (as a Jew recently got attacked for saying in one of the leaked Sony emails, even though it is just an objective fact).

Post-Script: Just a General Note on Hollywood

A lot of people in WN circles want to go on about “ah Jew Hollywood, boycott everything it’s all evil.”  Though I see that perspective, it shows a disconnect from the mainstream which has been a complete failure.  As our views are fringe, they need to be connected to the mainstream via culture.

And also, not everything which comes out of Hollywood is completely Jewed.  Though the studio heads are all Jewish, along with the overwhelming majority of executive producers, but the writers, directors and actors are not, and some okay material is released.  The Marvel movies are not particularly evil, and Avengers in particular was a rather high-quality classical melodrama.

Besides the character of Black Widow, a female soldier, the film didn't really have any social programming in it at all.  Which is why, presumably, it was so successful.
Besides the character of Black Widow, a female soldier, the film didn’t really have any social programming in it at all. Which is why, presumably, it was so successful.

Though I would certainly agree that children shouldn’t be exposed to anything that a parent hasn’t approved of, adults should be able to view some of these films objectively without fear of being swayed politically.

I don’t sit around watching a lot of video entertainment, but I do sometimes, both for purposes of observing the culture – if a big popular film comes out, I watch it to get a glimpse into the popular mind – and because a well done film can be very entertaining, and an escape from the harsh realities we deal with here.