Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Hey, well – this is gross.
We really should not be making new kinds of people, should we?
Mass-producing eggs and sperm in a laboratory in order to have a baby with yourself or three other people in a “multiplex” parenting arrangement might sound like the plot of a dystopian novel.
But these startling scenarios are under consideration by the UK’s fertility watchdog, which has concluded that the technology could be on the brink of viability.
Bolstered by Silicon Valley investment, scientists are making such rapid progress that lab-grown human eggs and sperm could be a reality within a decade, a meeting of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority board heard last week.
In-vitro gametes (IVGs), eggs or sperm that are created in the lab from genetically reprogrammed skin or stem cells, are viewed as the holy grail of fertility research.
The technology promises to remove age barriers to conception and could pave the way for same-sex couples to have biological children together. It also poses unprecedented medical and ethical risks, which the HFEA now believes need to be considered in a proposed overhaul of fertility laws.
Peter Thompson, chief executive of the HFEA, said: “In-vitro gametes have the potential to vastly increase the availability of human sperm and eggs for research and, if proved safe, effective, and publicly acceptable, to provide new fertility treatment options for men with low sperm counts and women with low ovarian reserve.”
The technology also heralds more radical possibilities including “solo parenting” and “multiplex parenting”. Julia Chain, chair of HFEA, said: “It feels like we ought to have Steven Spielberg on this committee,” in a brief moment of levity in the discussion of how technology should be regulated.
Lab-grown eggs have already been used produce healthy babies in mice – including ones with two biological fathers. The equivalent feat is yet to be achieved using human cells, but US startups such as Conception and Gameto claim to be closing in on this prize.
The HFEA meeting noted that estimated timeframes ranged from two to three years – deemed to be optimistic – to a decade, with several clinicians at the meeting sharing the view that IVGs appeared destined to become “a routine part of clinical practice”.
This probably isn’t even going to be possible.
The media posts these kinds of stories about “The Science” doing miracles to help faggots and other sickos all the time, basically to encourage them to figure out how to do things like this.
Maybe you could make a person from one person. But you couldn’t do three people. Or, maybe you could, but it would be some kind of mutant freak.
But you can’t do it now.
We can see the sob stories now: “I haven’t met a life partner, the technology exists, I should be allowed to do this”.
Total insanity; we are sleepwalking in to a dystopian nightmare. No, we’re not being melodramatic: it is that bad.
Government and @HFEA must quash this.
— SurrogacyConcern (@SurrogConcern) January 26, 2025
Barely any campaign groups or media outlets are paying consistent and in depth attention to this agenda, or to what is happening at the fringes of embryology.
That must change, urgently.
— SurrogacyConcern (@SurrogConcern) January 26, 2025
