Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
The Guardian website on Saturday published an article about a tranny fiasco featuring a truly mysterious headline:
There are at least three entirely separate things this could mean:
- Her boyfriend turned into a tranny
- She is a lesbian and her lesbian lover became an f-to-m tranny
- She had a boyfriend who was a female-to-male tranny and she believed for ten years the female had a penis (the person could have been using a strap-on dildo to have sex with her)
Try to guess which one it is. I will tell you later, after I’ve explained why it is so confusing.
The first option is the obvious one. However, this would mean she is misgendering her former boyfriend, who is now a “she.” You might be thinking: “well, he was a ‘he’ when it happened, and she’s referring to the past tense.” But, no. That’s not how it works. According to tranny theory, your soul was trapped in the wrong body, presumably at conception. When you “come out” as trans, you are declaring that you always were the opposite sex. You can see on the Wikipedia pages of Bruce Jenner or Bradley Manning that they are referred to by female pronouns even when they were admitting to being men.
In 2010, when Manning did his famous action, he was definitely wearing men’s clothing and using his male name.
One could suppose that this is for the sake of simplicity, as it would be somewhat cumbersome to try to figure out if an individual had already “come out” as a “trans” at the time they did a specific thing. However, that is not the explanation. The explanation is that in tranny theory, it is believed that a person’s soul is trapped in the wrong body. There has been no further elaboration on this. No one has explained how a soul gets trapped in the wrong body, and apparently no one has tried to figure out a way to prevent this from happening (they are instead committed to mutilating everyone’s genitals).
However, I would assume that the designation “boyfriend” is a “role” rather than an “identity,” and therefore it’s a tranny that could have, in the past, been a “boyfriend.” Therefore, if the first scenario is what happened, the headline should be: “I thought my boyfriend of 10 years was going to propose – then she told me she was trans.”
It would also be rather strange to refer to an individual with a vagina (bio-hole) as having been a “boyfriend” after she changed to being “gender male.” However, this has been done in some situations. Specifically, if a married man goes tranny, then he starts referring to himself as his wife’s wife, and she starts talking about their marriage as “when I married my wife.”
By the way, just so you know: according to multiple internet websites, this is very good for a marriage. In fact, it might be able to fix a marriage.
Therefore, if it is a lesbian situation, then the language is technically plausible.
However, the most appropriate thing would be that the boyfriend was secretly a female-to-male tranny. One may think “surely there is no way a boyfriend-girlfriend couple in the current year would not have been having sex, and surely the woman would find the tranny out during the sexual act.” One would be right about the first thing, but wrong on the second.
Women are very stupid and oblivious. There are many stories, particularly out of Asia where there is low sexual dimorphism, of women pretending to be men, telling another woman they are shy and have to turn the lights out during sex, and then pounding them with a dildo. It’s a very Asian-style act, but a white British woman was convicted of a crime for doing this in 2017.
Five years later, there is zero chance this would be a crime, as the woman would simply say she “identifies as male,” and therefore there was no deception. There is no longer any concept of “pretending to be a man.”
It turns out that the author of the Guardian piece was talking about a man with a penis who went tranny. She refers to the penis-having individual as he/him until she gets to the part where he told her his new pronouns of they/them, at which point she starts referring to him that way.
I believe I am correct that this is misgendering and dead-naming to call him he/him. It’s also noteworthy that the article is totally seething. It’s very personal for her that her man went trans, and she says as much. Nothing like this would ever be published by any of the major US liberal media outlets. The Guardian and other British media are often actually more leftist in a sense, but because the UK is so much less Jewish than the US, they just don’t quite seem to be able to keep up with the rules.
