UK Racial Harassment Case for Using the Word ‘Golliwog’ to Describe a Golliwog

Daily Mail
December 4, 2013

Money grabbing compensation claiming golliwog lookalike
Money grabbing, compensation claiming jobsworth Denise Lindsay.

A black chef claims that her white boss racially harassed her when he mentioned the word ‘golliwog’ during a conversation about the famous Robertson’s jam labels.

Lawyers for Denise Lindsay, 45, claim that the word is ‘inherently discriminatory’ and has ‘racial overtones’ and should not have been used in front of their client.

But her boss Mark McAleese claims that he was talking about the jam label changing and has apologised to her and said that he had no desire to ‘violate her dignity’.

Her lawyers are battling to convince three top judges that the word is inherently offensive to black people and almost always discriminatory – no matter in what context it is used.

Denise Lindsay's boss used the word golliwog in a conversation about the removal of the controversial character from labels of Robertson jam like this one
Denise Lindsay’s boss used the word ‘golliwog’ in a conversation about the removal of the controversial character, from labels of Robertson jam like this one.

Her barrister, Daniel Matovu, told the court: ‘White people don’t get called golliwogs. The word is an overtly racial comment. [The word] golliwog cannot be interpreted in any other way.

‘What the authorities make clear is that, when something is inherently discriminatory and clearly has racial overtones, there is no further debate.’

British jam manufacturers Robertson’s started using the Golly character, dressed in a yellow waistcoat and bow tie, on its jars from 1910.

In the late-1920s, the company started producing popular badges featuring the character, including a golfing, cricketer and footballer version. The items became collectables.

However, the cartoon disappeared from labels in 2002 after decades of controversy and jars of marmalade now feature Paddington Bear.

The company has always insisted that the Golly character was withdrawn for commercial reasons rather than a reaction to the controversy surrounding the figure

Read More