UK: School Asks 11-Year-Old Girl to Define “Hardcore Pornography” as Lockdown Homework

Now that kids have been forced to stay home for months, it is more important than ever for schools to figure out ways to reach their students and teach them about important life stuff, like hardcore pornography and drugs.

It is of utmost importance that this is done while the kids are bored to death at home, and more vulnerable to falling down the rabbit hole of internet degeneracy.

Daily Mail:

A mum is ‘fuming’ over her 11-year-old daughter’s school work which asked children to define hardcore pornography – among other ‘inappropriate’ topics.

Children in Years 7, 8 and 9 at Archbishop Sentamu Academy in Hull were set the work in their Personal, Social and Health Education (PSHE) class as part of their home learning.

Teachers have asked the 11 to 14-year-olds to ‘define’ pornography, soft pornography, hardcore pornography and transsexual pornography, as well as female genital mutilation, wet dreams, trafficking, male circumcision, breast ironing and more.

They were also asked questions about alcohol, drugs and smoking.

Following complaints from parents, the academy has now apologised for any offence caused.

The mother, who wished only to be referred to by her surname, Mrs Taylor, from east Hull said if her daughter had searched these phrases online in order to define them, the results would have ‘destroyed her mind’ and ‘scarred her for life’.

Luckily the mum of children aged seven, 11 and 16 was warned about the work in a Facebook post by another parent before her daughter began working on it.

The 34-year-old said: ‘My daughter is still very much a child, we’ve still got magic elves, her bedroom is done in My Little Pony. She is very innocent and naive.

She was only in primary school last year living her best life, now she is being asked to search for hardcore pornography.

‘She’s 11, she should be doing stranger danger, and don’t share your info online, but genital mutilation is another thing. It was asking about male circumcision, breast ironing…I don’t even know what that is myself.

‘I’m just thinking is there kids out there who have done this work? You would be scared at what you saw. At 11 I was playing with Barbies. If they have seen it they can’t unsee it.

Now it’s making me think what they are learning about at school that we don’t know about. We only know about this because they’re home learning.’

The academy has apologised to parents and said students were not expected to search those terms online.

Academy principal Chay Bell said: ‘I am genuinely sorry if parents or students have unnecessarily researched any of these phrases and for any offence caused.

‘I have asked that any future materials of this nature have a clear statement ensuring students and their parents are aware of any potentially sensitive content and will ensure all materials are fully age appropriate.

The PSHE materials that we share with students are produced in line with government guidance, the PSHE Association Programmes of Study and the Sex Education Forum’s definition of Sex Education. They also cover the Equality Act of 2010.

‘Students were not directed to research these topics themselves on the internet because all the answers to the questions students posed were contained in the teacher-produced materials we shared.

‘Again, I am genuinely sorry for any upset caused at this difficult time.’

The same government that is ruining people’s lives through the senseless and insane lockdown is trying to ruin kids’ minds. Both the lockdown and this homework are the result of “experts” advising the government.

It’s common sense that if you tell kids about pornography, no matter the context, they are pretty much guaranteed to eventually look it up online due to curiosity. The fact that the academy principal acts as if kids weren’t expected to look these terms up online makes one wonder if these people in charge of kids are stupid or malicious. In both cases, these credentialed experts and government people should be nowhere near schools.

Similarly, it is people like this school principal that are driving the government’s response to coronavirus.

Nothing they’ve ever done in response to the virus makes sense if you assume they have the goal that they say they have. Coronavirus is about as dangerous as the flu, the lockdown is mostly useless for curbing the spread of the virus, and the “pandemic” is mostly killing very old people. We have the data now, yet the government and its experts continue to push the Doom Virus narrative in a clear attempt to get people used to the house arrest way of living.

The government cannot possibly be that stupid by accident.