Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Is it really the parents calling for this?
I guess it’s single mothers.
Single mothers want to destroy their children to punish the father. Many such cases.
But… I think it is mostly the media calling for this, and then blaming parents.
The Guardian doesn’t even quote parents saying they want this.
As news broke recently that the Covid vaccine for children under five would be delayed in the US amid ongoing clinical trials, a call to make the vaccines off-label for use among those children gained force – but officials caution against vaccinating young children without any safety or efficacy data for this age group.
When providers sign an agreement to provide Covid-19 vaccine shots, they also agree not to give the vaccine off-label, or use it for purposes other than what it was approved to do.
In this case, the Moderna vaccine is approved for adults aged 18 and up, and the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is approved for those aged 16 and up. But the vaccines are still under emergency use authorizations for younger patients.
Providers who give off-label vaccinations in the US may not be protected by legislation that keeps them from being held liable in the case of a rare adverse event.
The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) warned last summer against providing the vaccine off-label for kids under 12, though that guidance does not seem to be available now on the CDC’s page answering common questions about vaccinations. (The CDC did not respond to requests for comment.)
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) also spoke out against off-label use of the emergency vaccines.
Offering the vaccine to children under five is illegal, “and that dose has not been studied in kids under five”, Sean O’Leary, a pediatric infectious diseases specialist and vice-chair of the AAP’s committee on infectious diseases, said in an email.
“If providers were to give it to these children, they could lose their status as a vaccine provider,” he said.
The 10-microgram dose authorized for kids five to 11 has not been tested among younger kids, who received a 3-microgram dose in the Pfizer/BioNTech pediatric trial.
It’s possible that the dose intended for older children is more likely to cause side-effects in younger children, O’Leary said. And if a serious side-effect were to occur in a younger child, medical expenses might not be covered under the current vaccination compensation program.
…
“As much as I want a vaccine for these younger kids, I think it’s very important to follow the process as it’s designed, as that process has given us many safe, effective vaccines over the decades.”
However, some families and physicians are pushing to change these rules, arguing that the clinical trials demonstrate the safety of the 3-microgram dose in young children, and millions of children over five have been safely vaccinated.
“I don’t see a difference in a child four years and five years, except for the age – the immune system works the same,” said Dr Wolfgang von Meissner, a family doctor in Germany. “I don’t see why I shouldn’t protect little kids.”
There is no way they wouldn’t be doing this if they weren’t worried about mass death.
Frankly, we think it’s obvious at this point that they are getting way more mass death than they expected.
Our assertion has been for a while that the goal of the vaccine was to kill people over a period of 5-10 years, from all kinds of different conditions, none of which could be directly linked to the vaccine. That would be the logical thing to do.
I don’t think they expected all these problems to pop up so soon, which is why you now have this mass promotion of the idea that all of these new things can cause heart attacks.
Remember when the media tried to make people think that the vax was some kind of luxury item that lots of people were fighting over, and then spent an entire year begging people to take it?
Saying that parents want to vax their young kids before proper approval sounds exactly like that.
