YES: Monica Lewinsky Comes Out in Support of Metoo, Retroactively Metoos Bill Clinton!

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
February 26, 2018

Glorious metooism, like a Nazi holocaust rollercoaster, is an unstoppable machine of Jewish destruction.

We now have a new Jew female ally in our fight.

Jew women may yet become our greatest ally against Jew men (Bill isn’t a Jew obviously, but is purely a representative of the Jew system, and metoo is largely an anti-Jew movement). I mean, why should we not be able to do the same thing to them that they did to us? Right?

Fox News:

The White House intern-turned-tabloid celebrity Monica Lewinsky revealed in an essay published Sunday why she strongly supports the #MeToo movement and Time’s Up initiative to combat sexual assault and harassment.

In the Vanity Fair piece, she noted the ‘90s affair with President Bill Clinton when she was a twentysomething White House intern was a “gross abuse of power” on his part, saying, “the idea of consent might well be rendered moot.”

She wrote: “I now see how problematic it was that the two of us even got to a place where there was a question of consent. Instead, the road that led there was littered with inappropriate abuse of authority, station, and privilege.”

Lewinsky wrote about how the support for the women’s movement has encouraged her to evolve beyond a victim consciousness.

“The reason this is difficult is that I’ve lived for such a long time in the House of Gaslight, clinging to my experiences as they unfolded in my 20s and railing against the untruths that painted me as an unstable stalker and Servicer in Chief,” she wrote in the essay.

She also said she was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) several years ago.

“My hope, given the two decades that have passed, is that we are now at a stage where we can untangle the complexities and context (maybe even with a little compassion), which might help lead to an eventual healing — and a systemic transformation,” her essay added.

God bless her fat, ugly, kike heart.

Throughout that whole thing in the 90s, when she had gotten caught sucking Bill’s dick and whatever else – getting stimulated with a cigar – she played this role of “I was just having fun! SPRING BREAK!!!!!11”

Which is probably true. She’s a wanton Jew whore, and Bill wasn’t some nasty old kike, he was in his 40s and handsome. In fact, he was way out of her league just on a physical level.

Like, if you just saw those two as a random couple at a bar, you’d be like “wtf is this guy doing?”

So for her to now go back and say “oh well, this is abuse I guess because of these new morals we’re working with” – that is simply great, great news.

Because there are no doubt all sorts of women who had illicit sex with powerful men and did not have a bad experience so have not started to metoo them.

This could well signal a new round, wherein girls who had good sexual experiences with powerful men come out and start saying it was abuse because of “dynamics of power.”

We need more BLOOD.

As far as I’m concerned, basically all men who have been in powerful positions in the last 50 years deserve to have their reputations and lives destroyed. And let’s be real: good men do not cheat on their wives. That is a very serious character flaw*.

*I would put a lot of ifs ands and buts on that in the modern era, probably, because women are not only horrible, but you’re not allowed to physically discipline them, which creates for many men an unworkable situation with their wives. So I do understand men who cheat on their wives these days. But only in the sense that I understand men who are addicted to heroin. Infidelity is a very serious betrayal of one’s own masculine honor.