After Billion Dollar Alex Jones Ruling, Media Calls for More Extreme Crackdown on People Who Disagree with Media

It sure is nice for the media to be able to attack anyone who disagrees with the media as evil. If anyone disagrees that people who disagree with the media are evil then, well – that person is evil.

It’s a real sweet setup they’ve got.

They’re just openly celebrating the chilling effect now.

AP:

A Connecticut jury’s ruling this week ordering Alex Jones to pay $965 million to parents of Sandy Hook shooting victims he maligned was heartening for people disgusted by the muck of disinformation.

Just don’t expect it to make conspiracy theories go away.

The appetite for such hokum and narrowness of the judgments against Jones, who falsely claimed that the 2012 elementary school shootings were a hoax and that grieving parents were actors, virtually ensure a ready supply, experts say.

What?

“It’s easy to revel in Alex Jones being punished,” said Rebecca Adelman, a communications professor at the University of Maryland. “But there’s a certain shortsightedness in that celebration.”

The internet allows such stories to spread rapidly and widely — and helps adherents find communities of the likeminded. That in turn can push such untrue theories into mainstream politics. Now the will to spread false narratives skillfully online has spread to governments, and the technology to doctor photos and videos enables purveyors to make disinformation more believable.

Oh jeez.

Which photos did Alex Jones “doctor,” Jews?

In today’s media world, Jones found that there’s a lot of money to be made — and quickly — in creating a community willing to believe lies, no matter how outlandish.

In a Texas defamation trial last month, a forensic economist testified that Jones’ Infowars operation made $53.2 million in annual revenue between 2015 and 2018. He has supplemented his media business by selling products like survivalist gear. His company Free Speech Systems filed for bankruptcy in July.

So, I guess he didn’t really make that much money, huh? He’s bankrupt and owes over a billion dollars.

To some, disinformation is the price America pays for the right to free speech. And in a society that popularized the term “alternative facts,” one person’s effort to curb disinformation is another person’s attempt to squash the truth.

Will the Connecticut ruling have a chilling effect on those willing to spread disinformation?

And there you have it.

They are saying “the chilling effect is good.”

This is illegal, actually. Creating a chilling effect on speech is illegal.

“It doesn’t even seem to be chilling him,” said Mark Fenster, a University of Florida law professor. Jones, he noted, reacted in real time on Infowars on the day of the verdict.

“This will not impact the flow of stories that are filled with bad faith and extreme opinion,” said Howard Polskin, who publishes The Righting, a newsletter that monitors the content of right-wing websites. He says false stories about the 2020 election and COVID-19 vaccines remain particularly popular.

This language is just unbelievable. It’s so tiresome. They just beat you over the head with it.

The vax is now admitted to have been a hoax. They said they were working at the speed of science and so it didn’t work at all. No one even claims it worked.

“It seems to me that the people who peddle this information for profit may look upon this as the cost of doing business,” Adelman said. “If there’s an audience for it, someone is going to meet the demand if there’s money to be made.”

Certainly, the people who believe that Jones and those like him are voices of truth being suppressed by society aren’t going to be deterred by the jury verdict, she said. In fact, the opposite is likely to be true.

Despite any pessimism about what the nearly $1 billion Sandy Hook judgment might ultimately mean for disinformation, the dean of the Annenberg School of Communication at the University of Pennsylvania says it still sends an important message.

“What this says is we can’t just make up truths to fit our own ideological predilections,” John Jackson said. “There is a hard and fast ground to facts that we can’t stray too far from as storytellers.”

No one ever made anything up. That’s why we’re all censored. Because the Jews can’t respond to what we’re saying, their only option is to silence us.

Silencing us and then saying we’re lying makes no sense. If we’re spreading easily disproved lies, just leave us be and disprove the lies. Maybe invite us on TV for some debates, where you can easily make us look stupid, given that you have all these facts on your side.

But no.