There’s some very serious program of normalizing satanism going on across the entire Western world.
At this point, no one really has any ability to push back on this, and most people seem to think it is funny anyway.
A bid to have satanism classes taught at some Queensland schools has been dismissed as “a base political stunt”, with a supreme court judge ordering the founder of the Noosa Temple of Satan to explain why he should not be prosecuted.
The temple had sought to challenge the state government’s refusal to let the group offer religious instruction at four public schools.
On Friday, Queensland supreme court justice Martin Burns dismissed the Noosa Temple of Satan’s application, after a hearing in August.
Burns also directed the temple’s founder, Robin Bristow, to front court later this month.
He said Bristow was required to show cause why documents, including affidavits and a transcript of his evidence, should not be provided to the director of public prosecutions or police to consider whether criminal action should be pursued.
Burns said he has no doubt that parts of Bristow’s affidavit were untrue.
“Whether his affirmation of those parts was deliberate and material to the outcome of this application will be for others to consider,” he said.
Burns found critical portions of Bristow’s affidavit were demonstrated during cross-examination at the hearing to be “entirely false”.
Bristow had also agreed the temple was started in response to a religious discrimination bill introduced in federal parliament.
It was his and the temple’s view that no religion be allowed in state schools.
Temple leader, Trevor Bell, launched the legal action, asking the court to set aside the government’s decision that the temple, created in 2019, was not a religious denomination or society.
The temple had earlier notified four schools – Centenary and Sunshine Beach state high schools and Tewantin and Wilston state schools – of its intention to provide religious instruction classes.
The group claimed it aimed to “provide students with information about the religion of satanism, including belief in Satan as a supernatural being, the canons of conduct and the tenets” and “to help students analyse the information and critically evaluate the religion of satanism,” according to court documents.
Burns found the temple has no genuine connection to anything pertaining to religion.
“There is certainly no evidence of a shared belief in a supernatural being, thing or principle, let alone canons of conduct to give effect to such a belief,” he said.
“The temple was not formed (and nor has it been conducted) as a religious denomination or society; the sole reason for its existence was (and remains) to push a political barrow.”
Burns said Bristow’s attempt to get approval to provide religious instruction in schools was “nothing more glorified than a base political stunt”.
So, they can’t teach satanism because it’s not religious enough.
Frankly, whatever these satanists would teach kids, it probably wouldn’t be worse than what they’re already taught.
Is there anything more satanic than tranny children?