Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
This is pretty disappointing.
I was really hoping to see the Ukraine get nuked.
RT:
CIA Director William Burns told a Financial Times conference on Saturday that the US’ intelligence agencies haven’t seen any “practical evidence” that Russian President Vladimir Putin will use tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has previously claimed that Putin could use such weapons.
“We don’t see, as an intelligence community, practical evidence at this point of Russian planning for the deployment or even potential use of tactical nuclear weapons,” Burns said at the conference in Washington DC, repeating a similar assessment he made at the beginning of April.
However, Burns added that in his opinion, Putin “doesn’t believe he can afford to lose,” and the US should therefore “stay very sharply focused” on the potential nuclear threat regardless.
The Kremlin has insisted that Russia will not deploy nuclear weapons against its neighbor, with Foreign Ministry spokesman Alexei Zaitsev stating on Friday that “Russia firmly abides by the principle that there can be no victors in a nuclear war, and it must not be unleashed.”
Nevertheless, Zelensky said last month that he was “convinced” Russia could use chemical or nuclear weapons to win victory in Ukraine, calling for the world to “be ready” for the possibility. Western media outlets have also speculated about the possibility of such a nuclear strike, citing Russia’s placing of its nuclear deterrence forces on high alert at the outset of the Ukraine conflict, and Putin’s warning that outside powers interfering with Russia’s war aims would face consequences “never seen in [their] entire history.”
But seriously though – there is massive room for escalation of this war, a whole long time before anyone in Russia would start thinking about nukes.
Firstly, they haven’t even destroyed the infrastructure in Kiev or Lviv. They could easily cut their power and their sewage completely within a day. No one who tells you “Russia is losing” let alone that “Russia is going to use a nuke” will explain why they haven’t bombed the infrastructure if they’re so worried.
Secondly, if Russia wanted to up the ante, they could start bombing more indiscriminately with normal bombs. They could kill as many people with normal bombs as they could with a nuke.
Maybe they will at some point bomb the utilities networks in Kiev and Lviv. Maybe they will even at some point stop being so careful about civilian casualties.
But the third thing would be done first – and this may well be done tomorrow, May 9: Putin could declare war on the Ukraine, and turn this from a “Special Military Operation” into a full-fledged war, which would result in sending in much larger numbers of normal military. Right now – to this day, in this conflict – Russia is relying heavily on the LPR/DPR forces, along with some special Russian units, including the Chechens.
The Western intelligence and media are simply lying when they claim that Russia has deployed over 100,000 troops into the Ukraine. It’s much less than that, and this number, if it is based on anything, includes the LPR/DPR forces that were already in the country and number in the tens of thousands. But even if Russia had deployed over 100,000 troops, this is still much less than the total size of their active military.
If Russia had already:
- Bombed out all of the civilian infrastructure in Kiev, Lviv, Odessa and other cities
- Committed half its active duty personnel
- Run out of missiles
Then, I guess, at that point, you could start talking about “oh well, maybe they’ll use a nuke out of desperation!”
But none of those three things has happened, meaning there is not yet anything close to resembling desperation, meaning that claiming they will act out of desperation is just yet another hoax and a scam from the Jewish media – which has thus far lied about literally every single thing related to this conflict.
I think Russia should nuke the Ukraine, because it is both gay and Jewish. However, like the CIA director, I am capable of analyzing this situation and realizing that they would not do that, as this would be completely unnecessary and would allow for NATO to make a move to invade the country.
We have to wonder why it is that the media keeps saying this, however. As the reader is aware, I am far from the only person suggesting that US/NATO is planning to stage a false flag involving some kind of WMD in the Ukraine in order to justify yet another escalation.
Remember that Russia’s stated goals were simply to take the Donbass and then force the Kiev government – i.e., Zelensky – to sign a neutrality pact. Those goals are going to be accomplished. The sickening Jewish media has added all of this other stuff, claiming that there was a “Battle of Kiev” and that this imaginary battle (which never actually took place) is proof that Russia intended to conquer Kiev. That contributes to the “Russia is actually losing though” narrative. In real life, however, outside of this Jewish fantasy on CNN, we are getting close to the point where Russia’s goals will be accomplished, which is why you are seeing all of these escalations, and seeing talk about the potential use of WMD. Every time you hear anyone talk about Russia using nukes or other WMD, understand this is a demand that the US stage a WMD hoax. This would be the ultimate escalation.
Taking Too Long?
Last week, the entire Jewish media jumped all over statements by Belarusian President Lukashenko that the SMO is “taking too long.”
Is it taking too long?
Well, the Battle of the Donbass seems to be taking longer than Russia expected. I think that’s probably fair to say at this point. That doesn’t really mean anything – obviously, this sort of thing is complicated, and there was no way that every single aspect of the conflict could have been war-gamed down to an exact date.
In theory, it shouldn’t really matter how long it takes, as long as Russia continues to gain territory and reduce the manpower and arsenal of the Ukraine military – which they are definitely doing, consistently.
However, the United States is dumping weapons into the conflict. The weapons alone wouldn’t really matter all that much, because the Ukrainians don’t know how to use them. However, the United States is also sending in PMCs who do know how to use them.
We have no idea how many PMCs have been sent in, but there appears to be a scheme to get active duty Marines to resign from the military and then sign up with one of the PMC groups.
Related: BIG THINK TIME: Can we figure out who hired this dead mercenary?
In order to cover this up, the Defense Department is claiming that it is training the Ukrainians how to use these weapons in Germany.
Ukrainians undergoing training on M-777 howitzers in Germany#artillery #artillerie #howitzer #MLRS #Mortar #Indirectfirespic.twitter.com/JgcUUuU7Hi https://t.co/beW3XuxFoo
— Missiles&rockets C-UAS Air Defense Loitering (@TimZitter) May 8, 2022
Obviously, you can’t re-retrain an entire military in the middle of a military conflict, but this gives cover, providing an explanation as to how the Ukraine is using all of these weapons, while they will actually be under the operation of US Marines posing as PMCs posing as Ukrainians.
If the US is in the process of moving an entire military force into the Ukraine to use all of this weaponry, I would think that Russia would want to speed up the process of sealing the Donbass border as soon as possible.
The US plan for this conflict – the reason that they provoked it in the first place – was to try to turn it into a boondoggle for Russia. The US doesn’t really care about “winning,” per se. They just want to drag it along for as long as possible.
There are rumors that Putin is planning on announcing an escalation on Monday, May 9, which is the annual “Victory Day” celebration. At this point, as a neutral observer, I would say that officially declaring war on the Ukraine and sending in a much larger force would be a good idea. They can finish off the Donbass, maybe close the sea by taking Odessa, then declare partial victory and continue to push for Zelensky to sign the neutrality pact.
Of course, I could be completely wrong, and maybe the timescale doesn’t matter. There are reports that Russia is seizing close to half of the weaponry that NATO countries are sending in, and destroying the other half. So maybe time is on Russia’s side.
No one seriously believes that the Russians won’t eventually take the Donbass, regardless of the time it takes, but the second half of the operation is to force a neutrality pact by the Zelensky government, and if by the time Donbass is taken, the Ukraine has an entire army of US marines operating US weapons on the new border, it will probably be much harder to force any concessions from Kiev – short of some kind of popular uprising against the terroristic occupation regime of Zelensky and his Jews, homosexuals, and homosexual Jewish neo-Nazis.
