Czech President Calls for Kebab Removal

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
August 3, 2016

SPA453adf_2008krist

You’ll cowards don’t even vodka before noon. Except Juncker. He does vodka before noon. Still a coward though.

Milo the Z-Man is at it again, injecting logic into the void of the liberal-Jew-feminist echo-chamber.

And the enemies of Europe are once again outraged anyone could possibly disagree with them.

Reuters:

Czech President Milos Zeman believes his country should refuse to take in refugees to ensure they cannot commit “barbaric attacks”, his spokesman said on Tuesday.

Zeman, whose role is largely ceremonial, is the country’s most vocal opponent of immigration, opposing even the government’s modest plan to take in 80 Syrian refugees this year, a tiny proportion of the millions fleeing civil war.

Zeman’s spokesman told a regular news conference that Islamist attacks in France and Germany in recent weeks proved his point.

“Our country simply cannot afford to risk terrorist attacks like those that occurred in France and Germany. By accepting migrants, we would create fertile ground for barbaric attacks,” Jiri Ovcacek said.

“The president does not agree with any acceptance of migrants in the Czech territory.”

The Czechs and other central Europeans have been the most critical of the European Union’s response to the migration crisis, in which over a million people entered the bloc last year.

The government opposes an EU quota system to redistribute asylum seekers but has not followed Slovakia and Hungary in challenging it in the courts. Hungary is holding a referendum on Oct. 2 to ask its citizens whether they accept the EU system.

It is not clear how Brussels will be able to force those countries to take in refugees against their will.

Germany’s European commissioner, Guenther Oettinger, blasted Zeman’s comments.

“The refugee quotas were agreed by a large majority and are now European law,” Oettinger, commissioner for digital economy and society, told the German broadcaster ffn. “A president who so defames European legislation weakens Europe as a whole.”

Why would you want even a single one?

What is the purpose?

Because it’s sad that they’re poor?

What sort of retard-tier argument is this?

Who’s problem is it?