Elderly White Man Faced Criminal Charges for 6 Months After Telling Airport Security He Was Not A Muslim

Sven Longshanks
Daily Stormer
October 27, 2014

1414362393683_wps_2_Colchester_man_Paul_Griff
Paul Griffith was on his way to Malaga when airport staff asked him to remove his shoes. When he told them he was not a Muslim, they had him arrested.

An elderly White man who quite correctly said “I’m not Muslim” when he was asked to remove his shoes by airport security has been facing charges of ‘racism’ for the last six months.

Apparently a security guard thought Paul Griffith’s crime so severe it required calling armed police to come and arrest him, despite him complying with the order to remove his shoes.

Daily Mail

‘One minute I am queuing up to get on a plane and the next I am confronted by two armed policemen.‘They said I had used racist language and took me to an office in the terminal,’ Mr Griffith said yesterday.

Mr Griffith was allowed to go on his trip but was arrested when he returned. He was charged with causing ‘racially or religiously aggravated harassment, alarm or distress’.

‘When I got back I had to wait six hours before they interviewed me again, arrested me and said that I was being charged with causing racially aggravated harassment.

‘I was photographed, had my finger prints taken and they also took a DNA swab from my mouth. ‘Then they said I would have to go to my local police station.

When I went to Colchester police station I was told I had been charged with an offence under the Crime and Disorder Act but that I could accept a caution instead.

‘I refused to do that – I had done nothing wrong and I wasn’t going to admit to a criminal charge if I wasn’t guilty of any crime.’

Mr Griffith stood his ground and refused to plead guilty to the offence at Chelmsford Magistrates’ Court and the case was adjourned.

Finally, just 24 hours before his next Court appearance, his refusal to give in paid off and the CPS dropped the charges due to lack of evidence.

They had obviously been hoping he would incriminate himself and they would not have to provide any.

The whole incident has given the retired hairdressing salon owner an insight into the stupidity of using the Police to enforce political correctness.

‘I have never fallen foul of the law before and the whole affair has been a complete waste of police time, the court’s time, my time as well as taxpayers’ money.

‘It has been incredibly stressful – all because I asked a question and apparently dared to use the M word.’

Deputy Chief Crown Prosecutor for CPS East of England, Frank Ferguson said: ‘Following receipt of the evidential file a full review of the evidence took place.

‘In order to successfully prosecute a charge of racially or religiously aggravated disorderly conduct, we first have to show that the language used was threatening or abusive and in these particular circumstances we could not show that to the high criminal standard required.’

He should count himself lucky he didn’t say the word ‘Jew,’ he could have got 4 weeks inside for that.

These speech crime laws are insane. While Non-White rapists are walking around free because Police fear being called ‘racist,’ if someone just says ‘Muslim,’ it is considered enough to start mounting a prosecution?

It is people using the word ‘racist’ that should be arrested, it is thanks to them that thousands of White girls were raped and thousands of non-White criminals are still free. There is no doubt whatsoever about this, it is clearly up ‘to the high criminal standard required’ for a prosecution, so why has there not been any?

1414362717038_wps_3_SHOE_CHECK_Shoes_are_chec
The 75-year-old was asked by staff at the airport to remove his shoes before he made the comment.