Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Yeah, I mean, it definitely used to be illegal for the government to spy on you.
There was also a presumption of innocence that a fishing expedition for teenage skanks posting tits violates.
An EU plan under which all WhatsApp, iMessage and Snapchat accounts could be screened for child abuse content has hit a significant obstacle after internal legal advice said it would probably be annulled by the courts for breaching users’ rights.
Under the proposed “chat controls” regulation, any encrypted service provider could be forced to survey billions of messages, videos and photos for “identifiers” of certain types of content where it was suspected a service was being used to disseminate harmful material.
The providers issued with a so-called “detection order” by national bodies would have to alert police if they found evidence of suspected harmful content being shared or the grooming of children.
Privacy campaigners and the service providers have already warned that the proposed EU regulation and a similar online safety bill in the UK risk end-to-end encryption services such as WhatsApp disappearing from Europe.
The UK’s online safety bill is an existential threat to safe & private communications
We’re proud to stand with other encrypted apps to make it clear: mass surveillance isn’t safety. Signal will never compromise the privacy commitments we make to people in the UK & everywhere♥️ https://t.co/Ry31IyNCx4
— Meredith Whittaker (@mer__edith) April 18, 2023
Now leaked internal EU legal advice, which was presented to diplomats from the bloc’s member states on 27 April and has been seen by the Guardian, raises significant doubts about the lawfulness of the regulation unveiled by the European Commission in May last year.
…
The lawyers conclude the proposed regulation is at “serious risk of exceeding the limits of what is appropriate and necessary in order to meet the legitimate objectives pursued, and therefore of failing to comply with the principle of proportionality”.
Frankly, if we’re going to make this whole “teenage whore posts tits” thing this huge issue, we have to start charging the girls, not the people who possess the image. That would remove the need to spy on everyone.
When an underage slut takes nude pics, she is, by definition, “producing child pornography.”
If a dude receives the image, how is he supposed to know her age? I mean, unless we’re talking about actual images of little kids – and that’s not what we’re talking about, because that is all de facto protected under gay rights – then how is the guy supposed to know?
Yes, you can maybe kinda tell the difference between a 15-yea-old and an 18-year-old much of the time, but certainly not all of the time, and if these bitches are taking these pictures and sending them out, the girl is the criminal and the men receiving them are victims.
Anyway, the idea that Western governments care about protecting children or teen sluts is absurd. This is the same thing they’ve been doing on the internet for years, claiming there is this huge secret network of “child porn” and so everyone has to be spied on all the time.
It’s basically the same thing as “we just assume everyone is a terrorist now because of 911,” except that 911 happened.
If there was actually going to be a witch hunt for “child porn,” I guarantee you, aside from teenage slut selfies, it would be 100% homosexual and the gay groups would start claiming that it was a witch hunt against gays, saying that they are targeting gays, because everyone is equal in every way so gays and normal people must do child abuse at the same rate.
It’s the “equity” narrative.
And again: they don’t care. They are chopping up little kids. This is just an attempt at justifying spying on everyone and I think at this point, even a lot of normal people are sick of these ultra-emotional narratives.
I think Greta – the screaming retard – really did some serious damage to the ability to emotionally exploit people. I think people are tired, things are tough all over, and someone telling you to give up your rights because children are being raped is viewed as offensive.
But of course, they give you these little wins sometimes.
That’s pretty basic psychology, which I’m sure the AI simulations are adamant about – if you give people little wins here and there, they will be much more accepting of a general endless downward trend.
