European Court of Human Rights Orders Russia to Recognize Anal “Marriage”

The BBC’s always asking the hard-hitting questions that the British taxpayer wants answered

Ramming your penis into another man’s anus, ejaculating into his poop and then licking your own semen out of his ass is a fundamental human right. But it goes further: it is also a fundamental human right that everyone in society says that this is normal, and celebrates it.

Also, you have to give your children to homosexuals.


Moscow has rejected a new order from Europe’s top civil liberties court that would require it to recognize LGBT+ marriages, after a joint complaint from three same-sex Russian couples was upheld by judges in Strasbourg on Tuesday.

In the ruling, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) determined that Russian law, which defines marriage as only between a man and a woman, breached the right to private and family life enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights in respect to the claimants. As a result, the decision, issued by a panel of seven judges drawn from nations across the continent, obliges the country to legislate for recognition of LGBT+ marriages. The Court also awarded €2,200 in costs to the claimants.

The case relates in part to the immigration status of one foreign citizen, who moved to the town of Sosnogorsk in the Komi Republic region of northern Russia to co-habit with his partner and their son. When his application for a new residency permit was rejected in 2013 over incomplete paperwork, he complained that requiring him to leave the country and re-enter on temporary visa terms would cause disruption for his family and breach his fundamental rights. These rights, the ECHR found, were ignored because his relationship is not formalized in Russia.

However, one member of the panel, Cypriot judge Georgios A. Serghides wrote a dissenting opinion, attached to the ruling, in which he said that “I am unable to contribute to opening Pandora’s box by giving the impression that the Court may allow applicants to disobey or disrespect laws, regulations and equitable principles and thereafter try to have their behaviour condoned and seek the protection of the Court.”

Responding to the court’s decision later on Tuesday, Kremlin Press Secretary Dmitry Peskov said that implementing such legal changes was out of the question. “According to our constitution, it is impossible,” the official declared.

Constitutional amendments passed after a nationwide vote last year have a specific clause committing the state to protecting “the institution of marriage as a union of a man and a woman.” In addition, the package of changes affirms the principle that Russian law must take precedence over decisions made by judges abroad, despite it being a member of the ECHR.

Defending that position, Russian President Vladimir Putin has said that “the requirements of international law and treaties, as well as decisions of international bodies, can act on the territory of Russia only to the extent that they do not entail restrictions on the rights and liberties of man and citizen, and do not contradict our constitution.”

It makes zero sense that Putin is still taking any of this seriously.

Since before the USSR even fell, it has been obvious that these “international bodies” are just an outright conspiracy, all following along with the social engineering plots of the World Economic Forum, etc. Klaus Schwab himself is a United Nations man.

This is now as obvious as the fact that all of these phases of homosexuality are the road to accessing children.

Related: “We’re Coming for Your Children” Gay Choir Issues More Threats Against Your Sons


Forty-three countries are a part of the ECHR, and not a single one had even a public debate about whether they should join or not, or what they get from joining. Most people couldn’t even describe what it is.