Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
If the Ukraine chooses neutrality, then this entire stupid and pointless conflict will be shown to have been completely without meaning.
Thus far, the US has said that they will not allow the Ukraine to become neutral again, and would rather see every Ukrainian dead. Washington has ordered the Ukrainians to fight and die and have all their buildings blown up in the name of Washington’s “global strategic objectives.” This is the first time a US official has come out and said “well, maybe.”
But remember: they keep making all kinds of different statements. I don’t know if this is incompetence, confusion, a strategy of confusion, or some combination.
RT:
Washington would not oppose Ukraine declaring itself a non-aligned, neutral country, according to US Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s testimony in the Senate on Tuesday. The US seeks to arm Ukraine to strengthen its hand at the negotiating table, but can’t be “more Ukrainian than the Ukrainians” and the ultimate decision will be up to Kiev, Blinken said.
The crisis in Ukraine, which Blinken visited over the weekend with Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, dominated Tuesday’s hearing before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on the State Department’s 2023 budget.
At one point, Senator Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) voiced his concern that Ukrainians were “being pushed and goaded by half the members of the Senate who want them in NATO,” and that they might have otherwise agreed to neutrality, as Moscow had asked.
That certainly would have been a lot simpler than this big military conflict, I think.
It would have also been a lot better for the United States and Europe, as apparently having a military conflict in the Ukraine meant that they had to sanction themselves.
And no – I don’t think that a revolutionary Jewish government installed by the US can be seen as “the voice of Ukrainians.”
Asked by Paul whether the US would accept Ukraine becoming a neutral state and not a NATO member, Blinken implied that Washington just might.
“We, senator, are not going to be more Ukrainian than the Ukrainians. These are decisions for them to make,” he told Paul. The purpose of the current US military aid to Ukraine is to give Kiev the ability to “repel the Russian aggression” and “strengthen their hand at an eventual negotiating table,” Blinken added.
What?
Claiming that the US has “seen no sign to date” that Russian President Vladimir Putin is “serious about meaningful negotiations,” Blinken said that “If he is, and if the Ukrainians engage, we’ll support them.”
Some in Moscow believe the US and the UK have influenced Kiev to backtrack from the talks with promises of support, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said in a TV interview on Monday. He also said that trying to negotiate directly with the US and NATO did not give results, as they listened to Russian concerns and then ignored them, “rather impolitely” making it clear that it was not up to Moscow to decide its own security.
“Listen, Ivan – I’m the sheriff.”
I’m not sure how much can be drawn from these statements from Blinken.
He is basically on par with Kamala Harris in terms of his ability to speak in public and answer questions.
Furthermore, the Zelensky regime is literally a puppet government that he runs. So this is like a ventriloquist saying “I’ll take my hand out of this puppet’s ass if the puppet wants me to.”
The fact that the US is continuing to pretend not to be in charge in the Ukraine just demonstrates the utter ridiculousness of this entire bizarre dramafest.
Rand Paul literally said “you could argue that every ‘country’ [Russia] has attacked was part of Russia.”
Based.
He actually cited John Mearsheimer, which is pretty based.
This 2015 speech John gave now has 25 million views.
