🇷🇺🇺🇦"Russia is isolated."The world stands with Ukraine in defense of the "rules based international order"
"NATO is not part of the conflict, but we will continue to support Ukraine for as long as it takes" pic.twitter.com/KNPyzo5KPo
— AZ 🛰🌏🌍🌎 (@AZgeopolitics) October 13, 2022
Antony Blinken is Jewish. When he says “the US must dominate the world,” he is talking about Jews.
But he can do that, because no one other than Ye is going to ask any questions about it.
RT:
The US must be the nation that sets global rules to make sure that American interests and values are supported, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken has said.
Speaking to the press at Stanford University in California on Monday, the top US diplomat explained how technology was the key to political power, impacting the economy and the military.
Americans “have to be the ones who are at the table who are helping to shape the rules, the norms, the standards by which technology is used,” he said.
“If we’re not, if the United States isn’t there, then someone else will be, and these rules are going to get shaped in ways that don’t reflect our values and don’t reflect our interests,” Blinken explained.
The other option is that there is nobody setting the rules, and “we’re going to have chaos before we have a world that’s actually organized to try to take advantage of all of the progress that we’re making.”
The administration of US President Joe Biden has repeatedly argued that core American interests require it to impose and defend what it terms a “rules-based order” on the world.
Look, I understand that I’m an anti-Semite, and therefore a disreputable individual. But even reputable people must be ready to have these terms clearly defined if we’re going to have a world war over them.
Namely:
- What are our interests?
- What are our values?
- What is a “rules-based order”?
- If the “rules-based order” has rules, what are those rules?
We can take the discussion from there, but as of right now, I literally have no idea what these terms mean. I’ve looked for an explanation, and anything you can find sounds like a riddle. I have joked about “our values of who we are in a democracy,” but this is literally what these people say. They barrage you with emotionally charged buzzwords that have no defined meaning.
When I hear “American values,” I immediately think they are talking about anal sex with men, because that is the thing that is constantly promoted. I legitimately do not know if there are any other “American values,” or if we are talking exclusively about anal sex. Certainly, freedom of speech, freedom of conscience, bodily autonomy, and economic independence are no longer “American values.”
I also don’t know what the rules were. In 2021, you could say that the rules relate to the US dominance of the global economic system, but after the Russia sanctions, that claim would just be absurd. You also obviously can’t say that the rules are “national borders are eternal from 1991 onward,” because of what the US did in Kosovo, and much more recently, attempted to do with “Kurdistan.”
This bizarre piece of terminology – “rules-based order” – implies that there are rules, and it is surely only fair to say what those rules are. They can’t be secret rules. You can’t have a world order based on secret rules. That makes no sense at all.
John Bolton and the "rules-based international order" pic.twitter.com/fLHzMgsoHG
— Glenn Diesen (@Glenn_Diesen) October 5, 2022
Explain the rules. Publish a document that lists the rules. I cannot name one of these rules. I literally do not have any idea what any of this means. It all just sounds like complete gibberish. I am very tapped in politically, so if I can’t understand it, I can guarantee most other people do not understand it.
Putin has said that “rules-based order” is just a euphemism for American global hegemony, and that frankly appears to be the case. The US has not responded to these statements by Putin. I would think that if there are actual rules, the US would have wanted to respond with a clarification, but they simply did not.
This whole thing appears completely unserious. I am willing to give these people the benefit of the doubt, but they have had that for a long time, and they’ve refused to explain what they are trying to say at every turn.
How does this look to foreign governments who are attempting to plan the future of their countries around the fact that the US is claiming total global dominance? How are they supposed to make decisions when they are being subjected to a secret set of rules?
Everyone on earth deserves to know what the hell these Jews are jabbering about.
“I want to be very clear about something,” says Secretary of State Antony Blinken. “Our purpose is not to contain China, to hold it back, to keep it down. It is to uphold this rules-based order that China is posing a challenge to.” https://t.co/og55Ozf20D pic.twitter.com/r5CNDrgb0J
— 60 Minutes (@60Minutes) May 2, 2021