Kazakhstan: Nude Stewardess Ad Accused of Sexism… But I Though This was Liberation…

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
August 5, 2017

I get confused about whether or not naked women is liberation or sexism.

Because women claim both, at the same time.

I guess it’s sexism if Slavs or Gook-Slavs do it, and it’s liberation if Western women do it.

But wait… aren’t Femen Slavic?

Idk then.

RT:

More than just prices dropped in a Kazakhstan travel company advertisement, which saw a group of air stewards strip down to just their hats. The video for Chocotravel drew mixed reactions online, with some accusing it of sexism.

“I’m sick of this sh*t,” one commenter said on Facebook, expressing her distaste for women selling their bodies in advertising. “Disgusting” and “cheap” were also used by others to describe the video.

Nurken Rzaliyev from Chocotravel’s parent company Chocofamily asked on Facebook if the ad was “too much?”

Not everyone was against the ad, though, with some praising its visuals.

Chocotravel director Nikolay Mazentsev said on Facebook the video was not intended to offend anyone.

“The video is bold and shocking, but we did not want to hurt anyone’s feelings, and regret it if it happened,” he wrote. “The advertisement shows exactly as much as you can see on any beach or in the pool. You do not attack girls in short skirts and people in swimsuits?”

Note: I actually do know when women being naked is sexism and when it isn’t.

When it is showing submissiveness and a desire to please men, it is sexism.

When it is sexual harassment of men, for the purpose of sexually exploiting them in order to further the “liberation” of women, it isn’t sexism.

Basically, it’s whether or not it’s intended to harm men.

And yes, that often falls along Slav/gook vs. Western lines. Just not always.

But this does demonstrate the entire purpose of feminism is not to “liberate” anything, but simply to harm men.