Kuwait: Army Allows Women in Combat Roles, Then Bans Them from Carrying Guns

The Islamic elite – at least of the Gulf countries – is on board with this whole “Great Reset” thing.

But they’re still Moslems, and they’re a little bit confused as to how to implement it.

Breitbart:

The strict Islamic nation of Kuwait has moved to modernise its armed forces by allowing women to sign up for combat roles, however they will be required to wear hijab face coverings at all times and not be allowed to carry weapons into battle.

In a move that has prompted widespread criticism from feminist activists, Kuwait’s government now allows women to serve but due to pressure from Islamic conservatives, they will not be allowed to carry firearms, and they will have to wear a hijab even though it is not a legal requirement for civilian Kuwaiti women to do so.

Lulwa Saleh al-Mulla, head of the Kuwaiti Women’s Cultural and Social Society has branded the restrictions unconstitutional and suggested she will be taking legal action against the government to change the policy.

“We are a Muslim country, that is true, but we demand the laws not be subject to fatwas [Islamic legal doctrine]. Personal freedom is guaranteed in the constitution, on which the country’s laws are based”, al-Mulla said, France 24 reports.

Ghadeer al-Khashti, a sports teacher and member of Kuwait Football Association’s women committee, has also criticised the the policy as she highlighted that women in Kuwait already serve in the police where they are allowed to carry firearms.

While Kuwaiti women obtained the right to vote in 2005, there are currently no female representatives in Kuwait’s government, with the only female MP losing her seat in December 2020.

(Protip: that means women aren’t voting for women candidates.)

The decision to allow women to enlist in the Kuwaiti armed forces – including in combat and officer roles – was announced by Defence Minister Hamad Jaber Al Sabah in October 2021 but was met with widespread condemnation by conservative factions within the Kuwait government, who claimed it violated Sharia Law.

Consequently, Sabah – who is a member of Kuwait’s ruling royal family – was forced to defend his decision after the Kuwaiti parliament moved to trigger a vote of no confidence against him, which he ultimately survived on the 26th of January.

When addressing Parliament during the vote of no confidence Sabah initially backed his decision to allow women to enter the armed forces, by highlighting that 34 Islamic nations including the “great Kingdom of Saudi Arabia” – where “Muslims pray toward every day” – enlist women and rhetorically asked whether the parliament believed they were all violating Sharia Law.

In a move to appease the Islamic conservatives Sabah also declared he “never said that woman will take up arms”, leading Kuwaiti feminist activists to brand the move as “one step forward, two steps back”.

I don’t even think it makes sense to give a woman a gun for personal self-defense. I think these right-wing memes of women holding guns are retarded and gay, the ultimate boomer jack-off.

In real actual reality, a woman with a gun is 1000X more likely to shoot herself, the dog, the kids, you, the neighbors, or some other innocent than she is to shoot some theoretical enemy.

The same is true in a combat situation.

A woman with a gun is about as natural and normal as a man feeding a baby.

The biggest difference is, a man is physically capable of feeding a baby, disgusting and unnatural as it may be.