Newsweek: “America’s Getting Less White, and That Will Save It”

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
December 8, 2014

Newsweek has an op-ed up today titled “America’s Getting Less White, and That Will Save It.”

It fails to explain what being less White will save us from, but I guess it will save us from not becoming a mix of Africa and Mexico by allowing us to become a mix of Africa and Mexico.

Seriously. It is hard to take some times. We attack the SJWs for going too far with this tripe, but Newsweek is a mainstream news outlet. I remember my dad reading it when I was a kid.

What is going on here? What are these people expecting us to believe? We can see Mexico, we can see Africa, we can see India – we can see all of the other places these non-Whites who are coming into our country inhabit. We can see them. We can look up pictures and video footage of these places, and we can see exactly what they look like.

How on earth are we to believe that because the people who created those societies move to America, they are going to create something different than that?

What is the argument for why? I have not ever seen an argument for why, but the only possible line of thinking could be that there is something magical about the ground on which America and Europe sit. Seriously – is there any other possible theory? I simply cannot think of one. It must have to do with magic soil and/or some sort of invisible energy field which exists only in Europe and America. And Australia and South Africa. And Argentina. And I guess Japan and South Korea.

But then we must wonder – why are the Blacks in America so completely incapable of doing anything at all, and instead insistent on dropping everything they touch down to the level of Africa? They live on this magic soil too, don’t they?

It just makes me incredibly angry that no honesty is allowed in the discussion. We are simply told to shut up and sit down – not just us “Nazis,” but anyone who dares question the idea that a loss of Whiteness is good for our countries.

Here are some questions that need answered (there are many other questions, but these are simply on the most practical possible level, which is not being addressed at all):

-How will bringing people into America from third world countries not make America more third world?

-How will lowering the average IQ of Americans effect the country’s productivity and general quality of life?

-How will Blacks, Latinos and other minorities fill high-tech jobs (the article and so many others claim they are going to do this) when they do not have the IQ necessary to fill these jobs?

-How will forcing low-IQ minorities into colleges and universities effect the overall learning environment?

-With all of the American citizens out of work right now, why on earth do we need more bodies?

-What will we do with all of these low-skilled workers, and their high numbers of children, when more jobs become automated (half of these jobs will be gone in the next two decades, according to some estimates, and with immigration our population will have more than doubled)?

The most important question of all which we are not allowed to ask is: why are we not allowed to ask questions?

If we are making a decision to completely annihilate and reshape the entire country, should we not at least be able to speak frankly about the reasoning behind this decision? How is it even possible that we are doing this, openly and on purpose – destroying the cultural, social and genetic make-up of the country – without talking about it?

Yes, we White nationalists as all of this “why do White people not have a right to exist” questions, but even for people who have no concern about race, there are all of these basic practical questions which not a single news outlet even dare mention exist, let alone address.

It is all just so surreal. Honestly, when you look at it, it is difficult to even comprehend. No wonder so many people look away. It is Hitler’s big lie.

But it remained for the Jews, with their unqualified capacity for falsehood, and their fighting comrades, the Marxists, to impute responsibility for the downfall precisely to the man who alone had shown a superhuman will and energy in his effort to prevent the catastrophe which he had foreseen and to save the nation from that hour of complete overthrow and shame. By placing responsibility for the loss of the world war on the shoulders of Ludendorff they took away the weapon of moral right from the only adversary dangerous enough to be likely to succeed in bringing the betrayers of the Fatherland to Justice. All this was inspired by the principle—which is quite true within itself—that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying.

—Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, vol. I, ch. X (Murphy Translation)