Ohio: Slut Social Worker Fucked 13-Year-Old Boy, Showed Up at His House Threatening Suicide

Previously: Ohio Female Social Worker has Sex with 13-Year-Old Boy She was Supposed to Counsel

These “slut teacher” stories are really a total genre of news, like black-on-white crime. This is actually a “social worker,” but it’s the exact same thing.

The funniest thing about the “female teacher having sex with male students” genre of news is that so many of them get so into it. It’s not really just “I’m aging and I want to feel pretty again” for a lot of them. Some of them get heavy.

I don’t know if I’ve ever said this before, and may have just thought of it, but part of the issue is that the teacher, when surrounded by high school students, starts to consider herself a part of the social pecking order of the teenagers. They target boys that are high status in the high school.

But seriously, what reality do women live in? Can you image being 24 years old and showing up at the house of a 13-year-old, where they live with their parents, declaring your love and threatening suicide?

This is what I’m telling you: women operate on a totally separate plane of existence.

Listen: if a snake started talking to you, would you take it seriously and converse with it, and then take its advice? Or would you grab the machete and chop the motherfucker?

You know the answer.

New York Post:

An Ohio social worker who was accused of sexually abusing a 13-year-old boy in her care showed up with a gun at the child’s home – where she blamed the family for “ruining her life” and allegedly threatened to kill the teen’s mom and herself.

Payton Shires, 24, of Mount Sterling, was charged with unlawful sexual conduct with a minor on Oct. 6 after she allegedly admitted to the disturbing behavior during a call with the boy’s mom and Columbus detectives.

But Shires landed in more trouble about 5:30 p.m. Thursday when she showed up at the teen’s home with a gun, WBNS reported. His mother was away but noticed the young woman on the porch via her doorbell camera, according to the station.

Responding officers found Shires sitting with a gun pointed at her head and with a finger on the trigger – yelling that she was going to kill herself, the outlet reported, citing court records.

The boy’s mom reportedly told investigators that Shires called her and told her she wanted to kill her then take her own life because she and her son had ruined her life.

I will continue to assert that these “crimes” these women commit with the underage stuff are not a big deal.

I will even do the “what if the sexes were reversed?” and say it’s not a big deal if the teacher is a man. I think it’s a bigger deal, because the man has the ability to resist seduction, but still, is it a crime, if the girl is post-pubescent? I don’t think so.

Of course, I do think it is inappropriate and morally wrong (all sex outside of marriage is morally wrong, especially adultery), but my position has always been: sex stuff like this is a private matter, and if the woman gets caught, she should be quietly fired. Involving the police, courts, and jail seems totally insane to me.

Who is the victim? The 13-year-old boy is going to have psychological trauma because he had sex with his 24-year-old therapist? I’m sorry, I just can’t take that seriously. Frankly, it sounds retarded.

If the sexes were reversed, then the girl would have initiated it, just like here. Just like always. Every sexual encounter is initiated by the female. That doesn’t fit with what you were taught, but it’s a fact. Sorry. The singular exception is a nigger-style street rape (and even then you have to ask “why was she walking alone through a neighborhood with loose niggers, if she wasn’t trying to get raped by a nigger?”)

“The government must regulate sex” is really a puritan and a secular idea. In Catholic societies, the general understanding is that this is the Church’s problem.

I can’t tell how fat this bitch is. She has bleached blonde hair, which is always a mark of complete insanity (far beyond that of an average woman).

But I can’t help but pity these sluts.

It really is: “I’M JUST DOING WHAT MY BIOLOGY TELLS ME TO – I HAVE NO CONTROL OVER THIS – SOME MAN SHOULD HAVE BEEN WATCHING ME AND PREVENTING ME FROM BEHAVING THIS WAY.”

Once again: women in public life is a totally failed experiment. We tried it. It failed, and it continues to fail.

In the context of the embrace of Irish sentimentalism, I’m gonna go ahead and subject you to this:

(It’s on KEXP, but the whole show isn’t – I would love to have the whole KEXP performance, if someone’s got it.)

Final Note:

I speak cavalierly about sexual promiscuity matters, and then I speak very soberly of illicit sex as a moral catastrophe. I’m well aware that there seems to be a contradiction here. There’s actually not.

Sex stuff is both “not actually that big of a big deal” and “something you can go to hell for.” No one is going to make it through their life without sexual sin. It is the most popular of all the sins. Even if you marry as a teenager, and stay faithful your entire life (which due to circumstance, no one in the West does anymore), you still have lust, and you almost certainly still have masturbation. You repent, and you move forward.

The other thing is this: while the sin is serious, it is not ever a matter for government involvement unless it involves violence or a pre-pubescent child. The overwhelming majority of sexual encounters between adults and pre-pubescent children are homosexual in nature. In fact, even these situations that involve girls are usually committed by homosexuals. I know this is a macabre topic, but if you look up that Subway Jew who was having sex with little kids, he was a homosexual who also liked little girls, because he was just generally a satanic predator.

The only other place where the government has a role is in prostitution. I am 100% opposed to banning prostitution, but it should be limited to “red light districts.” That recent thing with hookers walking through suburban neighborhoods near schools during the daytime disgusted me, deeply.

In the hookers’ defense, however, there are no designated red light districts in (most) American cities, because the government, in a massive feminist overreach, outlawed prostitution and renamed it “sex trafficking,” which is some kind of felony for the john.

But if it is a male and a female and both have passed the age of the loss of sexual innocence (which is puberty), and there is no violence that causes marks, then the government putting itself into the situation is simply tyranny. Sex is too private and too personal for the government to play any role.

It’s like seatbelts and drink driving laws.

It’s really like if you called the cops because someone was mean to you or lied to you. Being mean and lying are things the Church will tell you not to do, but it’s not the government’s business. In the UK, you can call the cops if someone is mean to you.

I guess the best comparison is the government banning spanking children.

Anyway, there are human matters that are outside of the scope of the government, and there should be a very clear line on that. The government/police/courts can get involved when there is physical violence against a person or a violation of another person’s property. Beyond that, there are a whole lot of immoral acts that simply are not the government’s business.

I know there are a lot of exceptions. I argue for the outlawing of pornography. But that meets a separate set of criteria, in that this is a public phenomenon which affects the whole of society. A teacher having sex with her student is not a public matter, and it doesn’t affect society – at least not until you blow it up all over the news.

This isn’t the best place to write this story, because the woman was threatening to kill the boy’s mother, which is a matter for the police, especially since she owned a gun and the threat was actionable. So… yeah, this is sort of different. But there are hundreds of these stories. I wish I would have typed all this out for one of those other stories, but I have a brain tumor, and I didn’t do that, so it just is what it is.

You get the point.

Everything I wrote here is true. 

This is going in the Illness Revelations folder, by the way. It’s not a new revelation, but the sex stuff is looming over us so massively, and is included in the Illness Revelations, that I think the Illness Revelations need one comprehensive piece on the late 2010s and early 2020s mass phenomenon of female teachers having sex with teenage boys.