Sri Lanka: Supreme Court Says Law Decriminalizing Faggotry is Constitutional

Legalization of homosexuality is the first step in the process of getting to the place the West currently is, where you have the open and aggressive sexual abuse of children by homosexuals.

Nowhere in the world have we seen the homosexual agenda get to the point where it slows down or remains static. It’s the same thing with women’s education and voting rights. These supposedly “reasonable” first steps always lead to the ultimate doom of child buggery and total domination by women.

With homosexuality, decriminalization is definitely the point of no return. Maybe you don’t have to have the death penalty, maybe you don’t even have to enforce laws against them if they are acting in secret.

The argument for legalization was “it’s not the government’s business what two consenting adults do in the privacy of their own home.” Firstly, that isn’t true, it’s a language game – it is society’s business, and the government should act as the agent of society. But secondly: it’s not like when homosexuality was illegal, they were installing cameras in people’s bedrooms. Even if two single men lived together, they didn’t get investigated, even if the neighbors were suspicious.

So maybe you don’t have to go full ISIS. But you can’t let them in the public with their unnatural and satanic acts. Legalization is about taking it public.

Reuters:

Sri Lanka’s Supreme Court has given the green light to a bill seeking to decriminalise homosexuality, the speaker of parliament said on Tuesday, in a move hailed as a “historic development” by campaigners.

LGBTQ+ rights activists in Sri Lanka have been campaigning for years to change the law in a country where homosexuality is still punishable by a prison sentence and a fine, leading to the private member’s bill presented in parliament last month.

The Supreme Court, after hearing more than a dozen petitions on both sides of the argument, ruled it was not unconstitutional, Speaker of Parliament Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena said.

“The Supreme Court is of the opinion that the bill as a whole or as any provision thereof is not inconsistent with the constitution,” the speaker told parliament.

Just to prove the point: in India, which is more or less the same race, and a basically similar culture (I’m sure Tamils and Indian readers will both take issue with that characterization, but from the point of view of outsiders, they are similar), homosexuality was just legalized in 2010, and they now have gay marriage before the Supreme court.

That will happen, and then they will start pushing for trannies and then child trannies, injections and mutilations, etc.

That is, if no one stops it. I like Modi, and he’s taken a strong position against the push for anal marriage. If India gets out from under the boot of Creepy Uncle Sam and joins Sino-Friendship for family happiness, he will be able to start rolling this stuff back, and hopefully he can re-criminalize the gay.

All of this comes from America.