Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
August 8, 2019
The entire purpose of feminism is to strip White men of rights, to punish and harm them. It certainly is not about what is best for women, and it isn’t really even about “liberating” women.
All throughout history, if you had money, you had pussy. But feminists want to make pussy literally priceless, so they can use denial of access to these goo-holes as a way to bludgeon White men.
They view strippers, hookers and Asian women as scabs.
RT:
It’s not just that authoritarian feminists are trying to shut down strip clubs, despite the protestations of the women who work there. It’s that mainstream feminists still think that these militant Puritans are their allies.
Not Buying It, a group led by well-known activist Sasha Rakoff has been terrorizing gentlemen’s clubs across England in recent months, by sending in undercover former police detectives to covertly film inside, and to document any instances of deliberate touching of the clients by the performers, which is banned under UK licensing regulations. The resultant tapes have been submitted to local councils in a bid to get the establishments shut down, with public petitions and newspaper coverage to accompany the drive.
I’ll just note here that I’m not aware of anyone with the last name “Rakoff” (“Раков”) who isn’t Jewish.
Campaign group, Not Buying It, secretly filmed in the Spearmint Rhino strip club in Sheffield. They say the film shows sexual acts taking place. Strippers like Ella feel their privacy has been violated and a job they love is under threat. pic.twitter.com/1Xvnp1Sr5S
— BBC Stories (@bbcstories) June 21, 2019
I can’t find the information online, but the fact that her first name is Sasha probably means that she is a first or second generation Russian Jew immigrant.
So take that as you will.
Now, nine dancers at the Spearmint Rhino in London, one of the best-known clubs in the UK and part of an international chain, have sued Not Buying It for breach of privacy, demanding that all existing tapes be destroyed. An earlier High Court ruling had already banned Rakoff from further sharing the tapes, so the strippers’ chances of getting their way in the high-profile case, the costs of which are likely to bankrupt the losing side, are more than fair.
Others might have been able to predict that illegally obtaining footage of people legally and voluntarily involved in a lucrative but potentially compromising activity might have engendered some pushback from the people in question but, to Rakoff, such objections from the women themselves are immaterial. They may claim that they are dancing of their own volition, but she knows better than them that they are victims of sex abuse.
And, while research by Not Buying It purports to draw attention to some perfectly valid specific concerns – about whether women are exploited, trafficked or emotionally abused as part of their jobs – none of that is important either. Because Rakoff has no interest in any genuine investigation into the industry, with or without hidden cameras, she just wants every single gentlemen’s club in the UK to be stripped of its license, as she has demanded since at least 2003.
“The industry cannot be controlled and needs to end,” reads the petition to the government posted by the group.
In fact, looking at its recent social media output, here is an incomplete list of things Not Buying It wants banned: prostitution, pornography, depictions of pole dancing in films, sex ads, non-sex ads featuring exposed women’s bodies, shop displays in high-street erotic shop Ann Summers, ‘sugar daddies’ and women having anal sex.
Look, I agree about porn and anal sex being banned.
But that isn’t the point here – most of these feminists don’t want to ban porn, they just throw that in there to disguise their actual objective, which is to leave men who refuse to go along with their agenda completely and totally sexless by pretending they are like, puritanical Christians or something.
All natural relations between men and women are a form of prostitution. That is the fact.
Historically, women would trade sex for marriage, which meant a lifetime of material support. Pre-historically, women would trade sex for food and a place in the cave where they were defended from the threats of the environment by the physical strength of a man.
This is the order of nature. Women only have one single thing to offer that is valuable, and that is their reproductive system.
This new Jewish-feminist image of women as “not objects” hasn’t really been fleshed out logically, because there isn’t any logic to it, but the basic claim is that women are valuable for something other than sex and thus men should not be given sex from women unless they understand this secret value they have beyond sex (this is impossible because women do not have souls).
But none of that is real. It doesn’t even make sense. It is like everything Jews say: on the face of it, it appears to be coherent, but when you think it through for a few minutes, it is meaningless gibberish.
The fact that all of this “women are not objects” bullshit is simply bullshit is easily discovered by how unhappy the “liberation” program has made women. Surely, women are not better off now than they were before this program was enacted – no one can make that claim. They are absolutely miserable. Because they have no purpose. They are told that they are basically just shitty, incompetent versions of men. None of these feminist Jews can explain a single way in which women have benefited from this program.
This is all just a plot to deny men – in particular, White men – access to sex, which is ultimately a way to stifle reproduction, as a part of a plot to genocide White people.
