UK: Homosexual Activists in High Places

Western Spring
March 13, 2014

This really is what they are saying.
This really is what they are saying.

What influence have politically-active homosexuals had in the enormous changes that have taken place in Britain over the last half-century?

That question is prompted by two surprising disclosures over the weekend.

Firstly, according to reports in the Mail on Sunday, an Appeals Court judge called Lord Justice Fulford was an active campaigner on behalf of the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE), whilst a very left-wing and “out” gay barrister in the seventies.

Secondly, in Fleet Street parlance, a real “marmalade dropper”, the Daily Mail revealed a love affair between two iconic Labour Party figures of the sixties and seventies, Anthony Crosland and Roy Jenkins.

Both men did irreparable damage to Britain.  Crossland destroyed the grammar schools and blighted the education for generations of bright working class.  As Labour Home secretary Jenkins oversaw the legalisation of abortion and homosexuality.  Not for nothing was he known as the “father of the permissive society”.  Yet both were living a lie.

As far as the public were concerned both were happily married men leading lives of middle class respectability. Were the public to know the full story – that both men were, so to speak, facing two sides at once.

gay-pride-08
While St. Georges day parades are now banned for being offensive, this sort of behaviour is encouraged and rewarded with State subsidies.

You could even argue that Jenkins had a vested interest in legalising sodomy.  Had the public known this at the time, their chances of survival at the ballot box would have been slim.

But that was half a century ago and now there are many “out” MPs.

There is no justification anymore for concealing homosexuality because there are no penalties, legally, social, professionally or politically.

One senior Labour MP Chris Bryant, even survived having his semi-naked profile photograph from a gay sex website published.

It did not stop him being re-elected so there cannot be any argument that MPs will be punished by a homophobic electorate.

Homosexuals are now a privileged group with legally sanctioned benefits and advantages that are denied to heterosexuals.  Try going through a public sector job application process to find out how true this is.

The politicisation of homosexuality is part of our political landscape.  Gays themselves did this.

The rest of society are entitled to know who is gay and who is not.  We are entitled to know what direction a politician is coming from.

Yet all this has not stopped liberal and left-wing MPs from trying it on, often for very questionable motives.

Cabinet minister David Laws was forced to resign after it was revealed he had stolen thousands of pounds in his expenses.

He used his homosexuality as a defence by saying he did not want his parents to know about his flat being let to his boyfriend.  You can’t have it both ways.

Rumours have abounded about the sexuality of many politicians including Tony Blair and William Hague.

Now that homosexuals are a privileged group and that no prejudice attaches itself to that label then there cannot be any legal objection to knowing who is doing what with whom.