Will the Open Targeting of Children Sink the Entire Faggot Normalization Project?

The gays are getting a relatively big backlash from the “pride” stuff this year. It’s because they’re openly going after kids. This was sort of a social agreement where normal people allowed them to be in public, and even to get married, with the understanding that they would not go after kids.

Yesterday, I watched videos from both Glenn Greenwald and Dave Rubin. These are two “conservative gays.” They both argued that things are going too far, and “normal gays” are getting a backlash from gays that are going after kids. However, both of these gays – who are both also Jewish, by the way – have “adopted” (read: kidnapped) kids. There is no more aggressive way to go after kids.

The gay thing is like the feminist thing. It is either/or. With moral issues there is no thesis, antithesis, consensus process to be had in the way there is on public policy issues unrelated to morality. You either have to use the Bible or you end up in the hell we currently reside in.

It’s good to see companies losing money for promoting this stuff. But it is much too little, too late. We can’t just roll things back to gay marriage; we would have to roll things back to historical norms, where homosexuality was illegal and socially ostracized.

Sinking some company because they try to force your son to cut his dick off is deck chairs on the Titanic.

But, associating all homosexual symbols with child predation is a good start.

The Guardian:

Bud Light, Target – and now Cracker Barrel? “We take no pleasure in reporting that @CrackBarrel has fallen,” the conservative group Texas Family said in a tweet last Thursday, in response to the southern-food restaurant chain marking Pride month on social media. “A once family-friendly establishment has caved to the mob.”

The conservative backlash against American brands appears to have reached new heights over the last few weeks as companies show their support for Pride month and other LGBTQ+ issues. It is part of a wider backlash against corporate involvement in social, environmental or political issues that appears to be gathering steam.

Corporate celebration of Pride month over recent years has seemed less radical amid growing criticism that parades and other events celebrating LGBTQ+ rights have actually become too corporatized. Critics have also pointed out that those same businesses are more than happy to fund politicians that oppose LGBTQ+ rights when it suits them. But conservatives have put those sponsorships back in the spotlight and are now more emboldened than ever to turn their fury against them.

At the political vanguard is Florida’s governor, Ron DeSantis, the presidential candidate who is in the middle of a legal battle with Disney after the company publicly criticized his “don’t say gay” bill to curb discussions on sexual orientation and gender identity in schools.

But the attack on “woke” corporations from conservative consumers and the politicians who court their support goes far further than Pride.

Multiple Republican states, including Texas, West Virginia and Florida, have divested from investment firm BlackRock for the company’s support of environmental, social and governance portfolios that focus on sustainability and environmental impact.

It is a notable change for Republicans, who for decades have been the party of business and fought the idea of government interference. Their hero, Ronald Reagan, once said “man is not free unless government is limited”.

But a shift has been happening. Since 2019, the percentage of Republicans who say large corporations have a positive impact has fallen by a quarter, according to a 2021 Pew poll. A Gallup poll showed a similar drop in Republicans who were happy with the “size and influence of major corporations”, dropping from 57% to 31% in a year.

Much of this comes from conservative distaste of “woke capitalism”, with companies coming out in support of progressive issues, such as LGBTQ+ rights, racial equity and concern over the environment, over the last decade. The shift has a strong business case. Younger Americans, who are more diverse and also more liberal, have come of age as consumers and companies have been trying to cater to them by promoting issues they care about. That comes with a price.

Millennials and younger generations are pushing this, and they have the idea that companies have a social responsibility beyond their business,” said Amna Kirmani, a professor of marketing at the University of Maryland. “Conservatives think that companies should stay out of sociopolitical issues and instead focus on their business.”

In other words, companies can’t appeal to everyone in such a divisive political landscape, as they are quickly finding out. Now that two major corporations have pulled back on marketing efforts that promote LGBTQ+ issues in the face of a rightwing backlash, some experts say conservative resolve against companies promoting the issues has been strengthened.

Eric Bloem, vice-president of programs and corporate advocacy at the Human Rights Campaign, an LGBTQ+ advocacy organization, said that it stresses to companies that they need to be prepared to defend their values when faced with attacks. Nike and North Face, he pointed out, stood by their decision to work with transgender models (Nike had worked with Mulvaney) after they faced backlash. Meanwhile, Bud Light and Target backed off.

“The message that it sends is that it fuels extremist behavior … and that they can make Pride toxic. Once they are able to make Pride toxic for one company, they’re going to move on to the next,” Bloem said.

“Conservative homosexuals” and “conservatives” who have accepted homosexuality are now in a state of confusion, talking about different tiers of homosexuality.

This is very similar to the TERF feminists who want empowered women, but not trannies.

We used to call this “having your cake and eating it too.” Now we might say “sucking a cock and swallowing the semen too.”

There is no dialectic. It’s either/or.