Ukraine Walks Back Statements Saying They Might Not Want to Join NATO

I know he’s Jewish, but I sometimes wonder if Zelensky is really a bad guy.

Of course, it doesn’t matter if he’s a bad guy, because the Ukraine is now a democracy, so as head of state, he’s a basically irrelevant mouthpiece who has no power other than to make public statements.

The government of the Jewkraine is run by a bunch of Israelis and the US State Department.

RT:

Ukraine’s ambassador to the UK was “taken out of context” when he suggested that Kiev may officially end its goal to join NATO as a means of averting war with Russia, the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry has said.

In a statement on Monday, ministry spokesperson Oleg Nikolenko attempted to cover for Ambassador Vadim Prystaiko, whose comments were reported on Sunday night as a significant revelation. Ukraine’s goal to join NATO is enshrined in the country’s constitution, and the ambassador’s comments could therefore be seen as unconstitutional.

US State Department employee Victoria Nuland wrote the current Ukrainian constitution.

It’s just all so moronic.

Asked by BBC Radio 5 Live presenter Stephen Nolan in an interview on Sunday if Ukraine might “contemplate not joining NATO” to avoid a war, Prystaiko responded: “We might, you know, especially [having] been threatened like that, blackmailed by that, and pushed to it.”

In the hours since, Prystaiko’s comments have come under significant scrutiny, and Kiev has scrambled to control the damage.

“Ukraine is not yet a member of NATO or any other security alliance. Therefore, the key issue for our country is the issue of security guarantees,” Nikolenko said.

“Undoubtedly, the best such guarantee would be immediate acceptance of Ukraine into the alliance,” he continued, lamenting the US-led bloc’s refusal to commit to militarily protect Kiev. According to Nikolenko, the best way to maintain peace and preserve citizens’ lives is immediate admission into NATO.

The whole big issue here is that if you’re in NATO, then you’re part of a suicide pact, where if you have a war, every other country in NATO has to also declare war on whoever you’re at war against.

As long as the Ukraine is not in NATO, they could have a small war in the East of the country, and cede some territory which is already effectively controlled by Russia anyway, and then be done with it.

If I led the Ukraine, I would say “okay, whatever, Russia has Crimea, let them take the Donbass, then we’ll have peace, then we can run a pipeline and all get rich.”

That would be the natural logic of the Ukrainian government, if they were actually about their own interests.

But they’re not about their own interests. They’re a pawn being used by Washington to try to overthrow the government of Russia by any means necessary, because Washington is run by people who want to create a one world government that the current state of Russia is cockblocking.

I don’t think the West actually wants an all out war with Russia, so I’m not really even clear why they would want Ukraine to join NATO. I don’t think they even do want that. What they want is to bluff that and to try to get Russia to invade the Ukraine to stop it from happening, and then fight a limited war with Russia inside of the Ukraine. Then they can add all of these sanctions, while also doing other things to destabilize Russia internally, then use Twitter to get a mob to gather in Red Square and rush the Kremlin and install Alexi Navalny as leader of the country.

It’s all just so exhausting that everything has to be based on all of these stupid lies.

If normal people had any capacity at all to comprehend basic reality, when the Democrats and Republicans started talking about “democracy and human rights,” they would say “yeah but what about Israel, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and all of these other brutal dictatorships that you fund? They are all much worse than Russia.”

But my people are destroyed for lack of wisdom.