The Antifa in Hong Kong were attacking random people on the street, lighting people on fire, and burning down malls. They had no clear agenda, and refused to negotiate with the government.
The US government has voiced extreme support for these Antifa, and is punishing the Chinese government for stopping them from rioting.
The United States is preparing to impose sanctions on at least a dozen Chinese officials over their alleged role in Beijing’s disqualification of elected opposition legislators in Hong Kong, according to three sources, including a U.S. official familiar with the matter.
The move, which could come as soon as Monday, will target officials from the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) as President Donald Trump’s administration keeps up pressure on Beijing in his final weeks in office. President-elect Joe Biden takes over on January 20.
Reuters has to remind you that they’ve said that Biden won in every article.
It’s a demoralization campaign.
The State Department and the White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Up to 14 people, including officials of China’s parliament, or National People’s Congress, and members of the CCP, would likely be targeted by measures such as asset freezes and financial sanctions, two sources said.
The U.S. official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said multiple individuals would be sanctioned. A person familiar with the matter said the group would likely include officials from Hong Kong as well as the mainland. The sources did not provide names or positions of those being targeted for sanctions. Two sources cautioned an announcement could still be delayed until later in the week.
“China has always firmly opposed and strongly condemned U.S. interference in China’s domestic affairs through the Hong Kong issue,” Chinese foreign ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying told a news briefing in Beijing on Monday, in response to a question on the Reuters report.
It is just really absurd the way that the West uses fake claims about caring for the wellbeing of the populations of the countries they’re fighting as a grounds for various acts of war.
Imagine:
This situation would be like if neo-Nazis were rioting in New York for months on end, attacking cops, lighting random Jews on fire, burning down buildings – all while waving Chinese flags, singing the Chinese national anthem, regularly meeting with Chinese officials at the Chinese embassy and even flying to Beijing to meet with high level Chinese politicians. Then after months, the US government eventually used the police to stop the riots, and China responded with sanctions, saying that the US is opposed to democracy.
It’s absurd.
Even if the Chinese government was oppressing its people for no reason (which is kind of a confusing concept – surely they would have a reason), what does that have to do with me or my problems? Why should my government be expending resources trying to stop the Chinese government from abusing its own people? The US government is the global enforcer of morality? Why? No other country believes that their government has the purpose of enforcing morality in foreign countries, other than the US and various satellite states like Australia.
Someone needs to explain to me how me, my family, my neighbors, or anything related to my country benefit from Antifa riots in Hong Kong – even if these riots are going to lead to freedom. The purpose of the US government, and the reason we pay taxes to it, is to protect Americans and take care of American interests.
We have a lot, lot, lot of problems in America, all of which should come before trying to liberate the people of China from their own government.
If the US wants a war with China, if they want to conquer and subdue them, they should simply declare that intention instead of doing this silly thing where they claim to be fighting for the rights of Chinese terrorists.
The lies and hoaxes are just so tiring, especially given that they are so transparent. It’s very frustrating to know that so many Americans support these dumb hoaxes.
“Two Names” Watson is Even Worse
What’s even more frustrating is that neoconservative homosexual Paul Joseph Watson got popular by taking all of my memes and talking points, and then went and added all this stuff about how we should have a war with China to protect Antifa interests in Hong Kong.
“Double Name” Watson gets people to follow him by stealing my material, then people start to think he must know what he’s talking about because he’s saying things that are obviously true, then he starts manipulating them into supporting wars.
By the way – just to be clear – I want people to steal my talking points. That’s why I run this website. The main purpose of it, at this point, is to put talking points out there for other public figures to use. It’s just frustrating with Watson, given that literally everything of value that he says is taken from me, and the rest of it is all neocon poison.
I don’t even mind removing the Jewish stuff, or removing the racist stuff – that’s whatever. We need to get these ideas across however we can to as many people as we can. But I just feel really dirty with the Watson thing. It feels like I’m somehow contributing to his neoconservative agenda, given that no one would care who he was if it wasn’t for me.
I don’t follow him, but I just went to his YouTube page to check.
First, look at these two articles I wrote:
- November 9: The Usurper Joe Biden Would be an Extreme War President
- November 24: Russians Comment on Biden’s Theoretical Appointment of Anthony Blinken, Jewish Neocon
Now, watch his November 27 video (or as much of it as you can stand):
He just goes through and copies, point by point. And it’s such great material, that people watch it, despite his repulsiveness and the fact that after fifteen years of making videos, he still does a jump cut every 3-4 seconds.
What’s especially bizarre is that he obviously reads the site to mine it for material, and knows I’m calling him out for doing it, and doesn’t even bother to try to obfuscate what he’s doing.
The guy is making millions of dollars doing this, while I’m eating boiled potatoes in a shack.
But hey – it’s ultimately flattery, I guess.