Victoria’s Secret Embraces Ugliness, Signaling That the Porno Age is Already Totally Over

Before
Now

This is really exciting for me, because I just had a really hot sex dream about Adut Akech, Priyanka Chopra and Megan Rapione.

RT:

Victoria’s Secret, known for selling the male sex fantasy, is doing some radical rebranding. The lingerie retailer is ditching its angels in favor of female empowerment icons, though some doubt it will save its bottom line.

The move, which was revealed on Wednesday in a New York Times article, is presented as an attempt to shed the company’s “dated” approach to selling underwear. It’s grounding its host of “angels” – supermodels in fantasy bras and exotic wings – and is putting forward a team of seven women to represent its new values.

The so-called VS Collective includes US athlete and LGBT activist Megan Rapinoe, Chinese-American skier Eileen Gu, Swiss-American biracial plus-size model Paloma Elsesser and Indian entertainer and rights advocate Priyanka Chopra. They and others on the team will advise the brand, appear in ads and promote Victoria’s Secret on Instagram.

The goal is to “redefine” what the company considers sexy, leave behind accusations of entrenched corporate “sexism, sizism and ageism” and hopefully reverse the trend of losing market share to other brands, including those that market themselves as being anti-Victoria’s Secret.

I have a lot to say about this. In fact, I think it’s possible, in fact, to use this news item as a jumping-off point for a total breakdown of the entire collapse of the Western social order.

Deep breath.

Okay.

Let’s go.

Firstly, it should be understood that women are now attacking something that was bad in order to replace it with something worse. What we are seeing across society, exemplified by the transformation of Victoria’s Secret, is the Porno Age being replaced by the Age of Ugliness.

I don’t think anyone could argue that the old Victoria’s Secret ads were especially wholesome. They were basically pornographic, and they were once everywhere in the society.

I remember being a small boy at the mall and seeing these ads in the Victoria’s Secret window. It was always quite abrasive, given that I’d spent my formative years in relative innocence, before the internet porno machine had really taken off.

The ads were intended to be the epitome of the male fantasy. It was the most beautiful conceivable women wearing the sexiest possible attire.

It’s fair to say that society is better off without this sort of imagery being on display in the public space. Of course, there is always going to be some kind of sexual degeneracy in every society, but it should be relegated to designated zones. That had been the norm throughout history, up until the modern period.

Phase One: Outlawing Prostitution

The porno society is a direct result of banning prostitution. Prostitution, and more broadly the prostitute section of a town or city (what we would call now a “red light district”), provided an escape valve for the various base sexual urges that naturally build up among men. It was a place that once a month or once a year a man could go blow off steam. Even if he was a perfectly religious man and never went into the hooker zone, he always knew it was there – and simply knowing he could go there, if he felt completely unable to resist, made everything in society work better.

I have lived in countries with open prostitution and countries without, and I will tell you: there is always a sense of pressure in a country that has no prostitution, a sense that women have control. In my younger days, I often went from a country that has no prostitution to one that does, and upon arrival, simply gone to visit the prostitution area, made sure that everything was in working order, and then left, never to return again, while being empowered as a man that it is there if I need it.

When a woman leaves a man, the man gets all emotional, with all of these thoughts of love and so on. Those emotions are an illusion, created by chemicals in his brain, designed to make him act to prevent the woman from leaving. These emotions are created by physical biology, which says to the man’s brain: “that is your vagina walking out the door, you need to stop this from happening immediately.” When there are vaginas for sale down the road for reasonable prices, a man is about six million times less likely to have a breakdown when the woman leaves.

Again: even if he doesn’t go down to the brothel, he can say in his brain: “well, I could just go down to the brothel.” This takes the woman’s power over him from her. That is why women lobbied to ban prostitution in the first place: to increase their power over men.

Without this release valve, all of this sexual frustration builds up, and men begin to tolerate the porno society. Before, when the red light district existed, a man who saw a Victoria’s Secret poster on display in a public place would have said: “this doesn’t belong here, there are kids around here – this should be in the designated hooker area!” When there is no designated hooker area, men begin to tolerate more and more sexualization of the public space.

Both Saint Augustine and Saint Thomas Aquinas – probably the single two most influential Christian philosophers outside of Saint Paul himself – said that if prostitution were to be banned, sexual filth would flood the entire society.

That’s really exactly what we’ve seen over the last 100 years – the cesspool overflowing into the palace.

Phase Two: Full Pornofication

After women were given the right to vote, they proceeded to reorganize the sexual order of society to make it more beneficial to them, which included their successful campaign to ban prostitution. You then began to see the slow sexualization of all of normal society. This started in the 1950s, with Elvis Presley and with the sexuality coming out of Hollywood.

Playboy magazine became popular and normalized. Hardcore porno was legalized. The media continued to pressurize everything in a sexual direction.

Flashforward 50 years, and you get the porno society that reached its peak sometime in the late 1990s, through the 2000s, probably ending in 2010.

Sex was used to sell everything. Victoria’s Secret was just the front-runner.

Virtually all other advertisements were borderline pornographic.

Music was pornographic.

Movies were pornographic.

Along with sex in media, women everywhere began dressing aggressively sexual. They were not fat at the time, and they were clearly competing with each other for attention.

During peak Porno World, sex was just absolutely oozing out of every orifice of society. It’s difficult to describe what it feels like as a man to not be able to look around without seeing half-naked women everywhere. It’s uncomfortable and agitating.

This noise all started with the concept of “standards of beauty” which was initially promoted in the early 2000s. During the late 2000s, women started to actively revolt against porno culture by getting fat. In the mid-2010s, they began attacking advertisements that featured attractive, fit women as “sexist.”

This reached fever pitch when a fitness ad featuring a fit woman in the London subway was banned, before London banned all “sexist” advertisements.

I think the banning of that particular protein ad will be remembered by the history books as the official end point of the porno culture.

At the same time that sexy ads were being attacked, we were also being told that it is healthy to be fat. At first, it seemed like it had to be a joke, but now so-called “body positivity” is a mainstream and accepted phenomenon.

Phase Three: Dawn of the Age of Ugliness

Victoria’s Secret models were a big part of peak porno society, and the downfall of Victoria’s Secret is really a signal that the porno age is officially over. The women they’ve chosen to replace the most sexy women on earth with shows that we are entering an Age of Ugliness.

You might have thought that a female revolt against porno culture would result in a return to Victorian values.

Women would have benefited from that.

As we’ve seen from their new love of the face masks, which is identical to the Islamic ninja-mask style of the niqab, women have found they like covering themselves from “the male gaze.”

But instead of a return to sexual wholesomeness, the female revolt against the porno culture has taken the form of a dive into the celebration of ugliness as a counter to the celebration of peak visual stimulation. Instead of women covering their bodies and becoming chaste as a way to deal with the feeling of being overly sexualized, they have made themselves completely nonsexual.

It is now an active movement. Women are purposefully trying to become ugly, as a way to repel male interest. That is why women are becoming so fat, it is why they are getting all these tattoos, it is why they are dyeing their hair these stupid colors, cutting it short – they want to be unattractive.

I really don’t mean to be nasty, but it is difficult to imagine anything more representative of “not sexually attractive” than this motley crew:

You would almost think that these women would be offended at being invited to this campaign, saying “oh, so you’re looking for the most unappealing women you can find, huh?” But they’re not bothered by that, because they are proud of it.

Ugly is the new sexy, as it were.

The Root Causes of the Rise and Fall of Porno Culture

When people see the above “feminist” before and after photos, the standard right-wing take is that these women are brainwashed by the university system. But it’s more complicated than that. Maybe most of these really extreme transformations happened in university, but the average girl, everywhere in the Western world, is gaining weight, getting more tattoos and doing more nightmarish things with her hair. You also have the phenomenon of fat women wearing pajamas and other gross clothing out in public.

When you look around, you see that this female revolt against beauty and normal sexuality is a society-wide phenomenon, and not simply something happening at the universities.

This is clearly linked to the oversaturation of pornographic imagery in society, which led women to feel as though they were required to meet some kind of “standard of beauty” which was beyond their grasp.

After the sexual revolution, women were in the open sexual marketplace, so they were in a position of competing with one another as they all attempted to chase after the same small number of men who are viewed as the most desirable in society.

The porno culture was a great competition by women for the top 1% of men. They were all trying to be as attractive as possible to land those men, and obviously, 100% of women can’t all win 1% of men. Women are now tired of competing for the attention of the men they want, and they’ve given up.

This is the flipside of the incel phenomenon – all of these women who are crying about how “men” don’t want them, while referring exclusively to the top 1% of men, are leaving hordes of ordinary men sexless. Those men would love them and take care of them, but women don’t even bother to consider that they exist at all.

I don’t want to sound overly sympathetic to women here, but it must be understood that they are not consciously choosing to reject average men – they are simply biologically incapable of recognizing that they exist at all, unless they are forced to by society.

This chart is an accurate depiction of the Porno Age (though these dynamics are largely irrelevant now that women have embraced ugliness as a way of life):

It was a slut race. And it clearly damaged women.

Just simply having sex with multiple men damages women, emotionally and psychologically. Of course, they want to do it, but it is like a child eating too much candy and then vomiting all over the place. Without boundaries, women will go completely nuts.

Now, they’ve collectively decided on making themselves purposefully ugly in order to signal that they are no longer involved in this competition. The few women that are still trying to look attractive are closed out of the social circles of the fat, mutant sluts – and they are shamed for “being too skinny” or “wearing too much makeup” (that second one specifically refers to makeup that is designed to make them attractive to men – they all wear a bunch of weird, ugly makeup). Younger, attractive women who have not yet gone beast-mode are encouraged by other women to get tattoos and chop their hair off.

Basically, women have unionized and gone on permanent strike.

If you look at the incomprehensible gibberish that these “feminist” women are spewing, it is all about them whining that “people don’t think they’re good enough.”

If you look at their “art,” it’s all about how they are rebelling against some image that they have in their minds of what “everyone wants them to be,” and how they are no longer going to try to be attractive, because, they believe, there are forces trying to manipulate them into being attractive.

Again, let me be 100% clear: the reason they feel this way is that they are sexually liberated, and that means that they are free to try to obtain any man they want to try to obtain. It is the natural belief in a woman’s brain that she deserves to be with the single most attractive man that exists on earth.

That mechanism in a woman’s brain that says she deserves the single most attractive man that exists in her environment is an evolutionary mechanism that basically means all the women line up outside the hut of the tribe’s top warrior and wait for their turn to get pregnant by him. This creates stronger children, which are then more likely to protect and care for her. It is an evolutionary mechanism.

In pre-historic times, the strongest man, being the leader of the tribe, was able to impregnate all of the women, and the rest of the men couldn’t really do anything about it.

However, at some point in history, the rest of the men in the tribe went to the strongest, best warrior and said: “bro, come on dude, you’re hogging all the pussy.” And the strongest, best warrior, being also the leader and endowed with morality, said: “you’re right – this isn’t fair.” Then, the institution of marriage was created. That institution of marriage was the basis for moving out of the forest into what we call “civilization.” It allowed for people to get over their sexual instincts and work together for a higher purpose.

Marriage has been called “sexual socialism.” In this system, the top strongest, best looking, most powerful men forego their natural rights to impregnate all of the women in order that every man (who isn’t a deformed freak of some sort) gets a woman. In theory, and usually in practice, women were distributed based on their natural level of attractiveness to men based on their equivalent social status (which in ancient times was mostly just based on height and reaction time, along with who a man’s father was, but became more based on intellect and creativity as society and the economy developed).

The tallest, fastest man of the noblest birth got the most attractive women, while the lowliest, short, dim-witted peasant got the ugliest women. Both the noble and the peasant were married for life, and their woman was socially compelled to stay loyal to them.

When the sexual revolution destroyed the institution of marriage, things got complicated. Women’s sexual instinct was still to return to trying to get pregnant by the top man they could find. Of course, in modern times, those top men can’t just get all the women pregnant – they would be hit up for child support and completely wrecked. So, the top men have to choose the women they want to form relationships with. This leads to most all women feeling rejected by these top men that they believe they deserve. And of course, the reason they were rejected was that they were not as attractive as the 1% of women who end up with the 1% of men.

Are you still following me here? This really should be a book length text that I’m cramming into a 4000-word essay. But if you can follow it, you’re going to understand everything about what is going on.

The second part of this is the fact that women no longer need men, because of welfare, affirmative action programs and no-fault divorce settlements. The government takes money from men and gives that money to women. The government also forces companies that are built and run by men to hire women for jobs they are not qualified for. This means that women no longer need men to fulfill their material needs. Therefore, there is no desire by women to return to the institution of marriage.

Instead, a woman can drop out of the sex game completely, and live off of the state.

Women have relatively low sexual drives naturally, but if they do have a sex drive, they can still have sex. There is always some loser or colored chap waiting around to slam a slam pig, no matter how fat and tattooed she is.

All of this is the natural progression of things from the political empowerment of women, which led then to the sexual empowerment of women. Women used that empowerment to make a total mess of the entire society. Now, they are whining about this mess that they created, and smashing everything up.

Fixing Things Would be Easy

If you were able to remove the system of welfare for women (including affirmative action and divorce cash-outs), everything would automatically reorder itself. You could even leave women the ability to vote, as long as they were banned from voting for the reallocation of resources to themselves. They would vote right-wing more or less 100% of the time. All of this disastrous behavior is being upheld by the ability for women to parasite on society, while doing whatever they want to do.

Women sexually liberated themselves and created the porno society. Then that didn’t work out for them, so they are now tearing down “standards of beauty,” becoming fat, ugly, mutant sows. This will remain the stagnant state, as long as the government continues to funnel men’s money to them. This is the final form of female liberation.

We shouldn’t mourn the death of the porno society (despite the fact that Victoria’s Secret ads now seem wholesome in comparison to what we have). Instead, this should be a point at which we reflect on the entire series of events, going all the way back to originally giving women the right to vote.

Cutting off the money would mean that women would once again have to compete for NORMAL men who are able to provide them with food and a safe place to live.

As soon as the boss came in and fired them for not being able to compete with male co-workers, then they called the government to find out welfare programs for women had ended, women would be lining up outside of hair salons, tattoo removal shops and weight loss clinics.

A few of them would become prostitutes – literal cash-for-sex prostitutes – so they could continue to live a wild life (they would obviously still have to lose the weight). But most would simply grab the best man they could find and entrap him in a permanent marriage.

The Series of Unfortunate Events was Actually a Pre-Determined Spiral

Women’s liberation is actually the planned destruction of the family. This is not a random series of events, it is a process which began with women being allowed to participate in civic society.

It’s important to remember that. There is nothing intrinsically bad about the development of civilization itself. It is simply that after the technological advancements in cooking and cleaning, when women were not entrenched in housework, it would have been necessary to put guardrails on society. The reason that didn’t happen was largely a result of Jewish influence.

Jews were famously behind the feminist movement. They were also behind the porno culture. It isn’t only pornography itself that was produced by Jews – Victoria’s Secret is owned by a Jew, and Jews managed this hyper-sexual advertisement world. Hollywood and the music industry are also totally controlled by the Jews.

Now, the Jews are at the forefront of the “body positivity” movement, promoting the Age of Ugliness.

One thing followed the other. This was a planned destruction of the Christian family – not a natural series of events resulting from the development of technology.

This Doesn’t Have to be Bad for You

It is unlikely that the feminist system is going to end before a total collapse of the Western world. But this doesn’t have to be a bad situation for you, personally.

Every man seems to think he needs a woman. I understand the feeling of wanting to form a family. But at some point, you just have to accept that this isn’t possible right now. Hopefully, the Western world will collapse sooner rather than later, and the women (who have just lost all their fat, fixed their hair and at least covered up their tattoos) will come running to you.

But for now, you should focus on yourself and your own personal goals, and not lament the fact that you don’t have a woman in your life. Life is much easier without women, so you should be able to reframe this entire situation we’re experiencing as an opportunity, instead of a curse.

Some right-wingers will claim that we have to deal with women in order to breed, but this is absolute folly. We have zero leverage in dealing with women – so how then can we deal with them? We will eventually have all the leverage, but several things outside of our control have to happen before that.

In the meantime, the option exists to do surrogacy. Women are launching campaigns to stop surrogacy, because a few of them are smart enough to understand the implications.

But it will still exist, so long as this civilization exists. If you are not focused on women, you can figure out ways to get the money to pay for surrogacy.

It is not living in reality to imagine that you are going to make a marriage work within this current order. Most women are now one of the beasts you see above, and those that aren’t are not interested in marriage. If you can convince one to marry you, you’re completely controlled by her whims, and she can destroy the marriage at any time she wants, for any reason or no reason, and strip you of your wealth.

If you do try the marriage thing, then you need to hide your money. You can also just get women pregnant, and figure out ways to not pay child support (possibly by faking insanity or faking your own death).

The rule should be: focus on yourself (that includes friends and family – just not women). If you get to the point where you’re able to bend that rule, it will be because you’ve already put your own wellbeing first.

Right now, we are in the last stages of a total social collapse. Trying to make anything work right now is nuts, and if you figure out some life hack, you are in the minority, and it will not be something that is repeatable at scale.

The clock is ticking on what’s left of this civilization. Just look around. The child trannies, the virus hoax, the black rioting and crime, the launching of all of these aggressive wars – it cannot possibly last. Something is going to have to give.

When Sino-Friendship starts coming into view, all the rules will be very different.

If you focus on yourself now, get in good shape, become a landowner, become a good and moral man, you will have your pick of the skanks when the beast finally comes unglued.

Editor’s Note: I understand there are serious structural problems with this article, but I felt the need to put this all out there. Fixing the structural problems would take twice as long as writing it out in the first place – time which I do not have. Eventually, I’m going to go back and take some of these longer articles, rewrite them, and publish them as a book. Until then, just think of this as an edgy work of creative nonfiction, where the structural problems are all actually on purpose, because edginess.