White House Finally Saying the Ukraine has to Surrender

Jake Sullivan: the world’s preeminent war strategist.

NATO said it, now the White House is saying it: the Ukraine has to surrender.

Of course, these people talk out of both sides of their mouths constantly, so it’s just as likely they’ll come out in a few hours and say “we’ll fight to the last Ukrainian.”

Still, this is the first time that the White House has said it’s time to surrender.

RT:

As high-ranking White House officials argued the conflict in Ukraine has to have a diplomatic solution, media outlets close to US intelligence reported on Thursday of increasing concerns about Kiev’s hard-line position amid the deteriorating situation on the battlefield. Meanwhile, Ukraine’s defense minister vowed to fight until total victory.

The US will continue to help Ukraine “to the maximum extent possible,” national security adviser Jake Sullivan said Thursday, “first on the battlefield, and then, ultimately at the negotiating table. We think this has to end with diplomacy.”

This is of course the diametric opposite of what the White House and State Department have been saying for four months. They said the victory would be won on the battlefield.

Also, just to be clear, “negotiation” is a thin codeword for “surrender.” The Ukraine has no cards at all. They are going to meet all of Russia’s initial demands, which means it is a surrender.

Biden will go out and say “our successful negotiating team convinced Putin not to invade Poland” or whatever.

Sullivan was speaking at the Center for New American Security (CNAS), a Washington, DC-based lobby group  close to the Democratic Party.

CNAS is funded by the likes of Northrop Grumman and Raytheon, which stand to make huge revenues from replenishing American weapons stocks after the conflict. It also received at least $500,000 last year from the US Department of Defence to promote its interests.

It was at CNAS that the Pentagon’s policy chief Colin Kahl revealed earlier this week the US would send Ukraine guided missiles for the HIMARS rocket launchers.

Yeah, it’s just a garbled mess where no one is in charge of anything.

Gifting them as many weapons as possible before the surrender helps out the defense contractors, and all of it is just going to be blamed on Joe Biden anyway, so who cares?

While NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has suggested that Ukraine might have to give up some territory for peace, Sullivan said such a decision was entirely up to Kiev.

“We are not going to be pressing them to make territorial concessions. We think that’s frankly wrong,” he told CNAS.

Again, just meaningless gibberish – what are you going to negotiate about?

Sullivan’s comments came after a NBC News report which claimed that some US and European officials were “increasingly concerned that the trajectory of the war in Ukraine is untenable” and were “quietly discussing” asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to “temper his hard-line public position” that no territory will ever be ceded to Russia.

The outlet cited seven current and former US and European officials. The story was co-authored by Ken Dilanian, who is known for links with the CIA. One anonymous US official said Washington was not pressuring Kiev to make concessions, “as some Europeans are,” but was “planning for a long war” instead.

NBC also claimed that US President Joe Biden was “not happy” when Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin talked about “winning” the war in late April, after visiting Kiev, but was reportedly persuaded when they told him their remarks had been misinterpreted by the media.

“They believe that we can win; we believe that they – we can win – they can win if they have the right equipment, the right support,” Austin said at the time, adding the US wanted to “see Russia weakened.”

While Austin’s policy chief and Biden’s former security adviser Kahl claimed the fighting was going well for Kiev, senior Ukrainian officials admitted to losing 1,000 men every day, as the Russian and allied forces continued to advance.

They not only admitted to losing 1,000 men a day, they said outright that they are losing the war.

With NATO and now Sullivan admitting that there are going to have to be “negotiations,” what is the point of this even supposed to be?

Is it really just pressure from the weapons manufacturers?