Americans Don’t Have to Eat Less Meat to Fight Climate Change, Agriculture Secretary Says

Previously: The Guardian Publishes Voodoo Op-ed Claiming Covid May be Gaia’s Attempt at Protecting Itself from Humans

See, even true believers in The Science think eating bugs to stop heating is a scam.

The government just wants to humiliate you by forcing you to eat bugs.

The Guardian:

Americans can carry on eating meat while keeping the world within safe limits on global heating, the US secretary of agriculture has insisted.

Thomas Vilsack said: “I do not think we have to reduce the amount of meat or livestock produced in the US. And a significant percentage is exported. It’s not a question of eating more or less or producing more or less. The question is making production more sustainable.”

He told the Guardian in an interview at the Cop26 summit in Glasgow that livestock production could be made more efficient, and the amount of methane produced by farm animals reduced, which along with other measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture would be enough to reduce carbon from farming.

Ruminants such as cattle and sheep produce methane, as does animal manure. The potent greenhouse gas has a heating effect about 80 times greater than carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, though it breaks down sooner. Meat accounts for about 60% of greenhouse gas production from agriculture, which itself is one of the highest carbon-producing sectors globally.

The US, the EU and scores of other countries signed a deal at Cop26 to reduce global methane emissions by 30% by 2030, though none of the countries have taken on a firm national reduction goal under the deal. If the target is reached, global heating could be reduced by about 0.2C.

Vilsack said: “If you reduce methane by livestock by 30%, by food additives or different feed, or you capture the methane to biogas – take the manure and use it as biofuel – then you have made livestock production more sustainable. I do not think you need to reduce meat consumption to get that.”

He added: “If we are going to feed 9 billion people, you need meat protein. We will need plant, animal and fish protein.”

This is an example of someone trying to rationalize with a hoax. The entire purpose of the global warming hoax is to destroy the lives of people in white countries.

It’s not really a mystery. Plenty of books have been written about it.