Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Belle is refusing to cuck out on her rape porno.
Content warning: Mentions of rape and sexual assault.
YouTube star Belle Delphine has defended her actions after being accused of ‘fetishising rape’ by sharing shocking photos online without a disclaimer or warning.
The 21-year-old, who boasts a following of more than a million, shared a string of photos on Twitter, which depict her being tied up in the back of a van and a man having sex with her against a tree.
She captioned the photos: ‘My perfect first date <3’.
Some followers have slammed her for not including a disclaimer or content warning on her post.
Others have accused her of ‘fetishising rape and sexual assault’ with the post, while some have said her outfit, a blue dress, knee-high socks and boots, makes it look as if she has dressed up as a child for the photos.
Belle defended her post and denied dressing as a child, telling Metro.co.uk in a statement: ‘There is nothing wrong with enjoying powerplay and BDSM where both people are consensual.
‘I think saying because I enjoy consensual non-consent is promoting rape, is the same as the argument that violence in video games promotes violence, I made it very clear in the caption of my photo, and anything written about it that I was enjoying it and that is was consensual, I never said the word rape, or anything against my will.
‘This is what other people have put onto it. I enjoy the idea of being tied up and used (with my consent, obviously). Another thing that people have said, is that I’m trying to dress like a child, which to me is insane. I felt like dressing vintage that day and even styled my hair in a beehive that was very common for women of that time.
‘All the clothes I wear are made for adults, so the only thing that people can comment on maybe is the fact that I’m wearing a dress? It’s very confusing for me. No one likes rape, no one wants rape to exist.’
Belle went on to refer to studies into power play fantasies, claiming that a large proportion of women have them.
‘I consented to being tied up and to having rough sex,’ she continued.
‘I am not apologising for anything, what I did wasn’t wrong, and much more normal than people think. Look at one of the most common sexual outfits and fantasies, schoolgirl. If you wear that are you promoting paedophilia now?
‘The front page of porn websites include fantasy scenario’s of every different kind you can think of. Incest, step-mom, teacher etc. Just because someone likes the fantasy of something, doesn’t mean they want it in real life [sic].
‘Sex is complex and explorative, but should always be consensual. I post a lot of sexual stuff to my twitter, because it’s for my Onlyfans, people who are sensitive to kinks and sexual content shouldn’t be following me, I’ve made it very clear that I’m posting hard-core porn.’
Twitter was mass calling for Delphine to be banned like Trump.
I don’t defend porn.
But frankly, anyone who complains about any specific type of porn, while not simply denouncing the concept, I’m against. I’ve never heard a good argument for allowing some porn types and not other types.
I wrote a long thing explaining that what Delphine did is not really worse than what anyone else does sexually, frankly.
The government should be banning porn under obscenity laws, which would be very easy. There has never been any Supreme Court ruling that allows porn, it is solely allowed by state law consent.
At this point, you now have Visa and Mastercard banning porno websites, arbitrarily.
Let me ask you this: do you believe that Jewish bankers are worried about the morality of pornography?
This is just another way to up the ante of censorship.
It’s just like when they banned me. At the time, I had swastikas all over the site, and was making some really edgy jokes. It was easy to stir up a hate mob against me, just like it is easy to stir up a hate mob against porno.
But every single anti-porn advocate out there supporting these private censorship measures against porno is a moron who has no idea what is going on.
Again: there is no law protecting porno. There are all kinds of different ways to attack porn producers and distributors that do not involve setting a precedent against freedom of speech, that don’t give financial institutions the ability to arbitrarily ban whoever they want based on rumors.
It’s the same thing with trying to ban Belle Delphine. It’s completely arbitrary. There is all kinds of rape porno all over the internet; they are targeting her because they’re jealous, or because the content made them uncomfortable. However, this idea of just randomly banning anyone who a mob is stirred up against is stupid and wrong, and it actually weakens arguments for using the legal system to ban pornography.
I guarantee you, just as there is a social justice mob calling for a Twitter ban, there is some Jew somewhere trying to get Belle Delphine banned from using PayPal and Mastercard, just because they support establishing precedent to ban anyone for anything.
Of course, none of this even really matters anymore. The legal system is totally gone. So is freedom of speech. So, whatever. Ban her, I guess. It doesn’t make any difference at this point.
