Experts Warn of Impending Terrorist Attacks on US Soil

Generally, I think it makes sense to dismiss US government or “expert” “terror warnings” as nonsense.

However, at this point, it would make sense if Moslems actually did something. It would also make sense if the fedgov staged a fake Moslem attack in order to justify their escalating war in the Middle East.

While this might be “taken seriously” as a possibility, I don’t think an individual can “take it seriously.”

What are you supposed to do? Just not leave your house? That doesn’t seem very reasonable.

(But hey – maybe people shouldn’t be living in these big filthy metros in the first place, huh?)

New York Post:

The threat of a major terror event taking place on U.S. soil is at a dangerously high level with big cities like New York City and Washington, D.C. most vulnerable to an attack, terror experts are warning.

It’s been over 23 years since nearly 3,000 people perished on 9/11, but even though surveillance and airport security has been beefed up, the world has changed considerably since then.

Surveillance and airport security have never stopped a terrorist attack.

Anyone serious can still do whatever they want.

There is no such thing as a perfectly safe society.

Technology has become cheaper and more advanced, the internet is lightning fast and America’s open border means millions of unvetted people from all over the world are now living among the general population and continue to pour in at record rates.

“We are in a period where a number of factors are combining to make a terrorist attack on the homeland far more likely than it perhaps had been,” says Paul Mauro, a retired NYPD inspector who worked in counterterrorism for nearly 15 years.

Mauro said the risk of a potential new attack should be assessed in a criminal context – who has the means, motive and opportunity to successfully execute a deadly plot.

“The world has gotten a lot smaller since 9/11. You’ve got drones, the interconnectivity of the internet is more ubiquitous into areas that maybe didn’t have that connectivity. You can get an uplink using something like an Elon Musk satellite. You can get online from the mountains of the Hindu Kush, you’ve got AI capabilities, you’ve had all that time to develop capabilities since 9/11 if you are still in the [terror] business.”

Wow, what a scary world.

Mauro said that threats would likely emanate from current hot spots around the globe, including the Middle East, where Iran is a live threat and is still seeking revenge for the killing of Qasem Soleimani, an Iranian major general who was taken out in a 2020 U.S. drone strike.

Those angered by Israel’s response to the Oct. 7 attacks in Gaza also pose a real threat, as does a “nuclear capable” Russia, which has been battling against a U.S.-funded regime in Ukraine, Mauro said.

It’s not hard to see motives all over the place, motives that preexisted 9/11 and that continue and have only been exacerbated,” he said.


Because absolute safety is impossible (and not really desirable either), your best bet is to have as few people as possible interested in committing terrorist attacks living inside your borders.

Regrettably, this is not the philosophy of the US fedgov. They prefer to strip-search old people and babies at the airport, while maintaining an open border, and creating hatred for America all over the world.

Mauro said the opportunity for terrorists lies at the southern border.

We’ve let 10 to 20 million illegals into the country with little or no vetting. It’s a canard to think that they’re all just from small towns in Mexico or Bolivia or Ecuador or something,” Mauro says.

“We’re seeing a wave of migrant-related crime developing now, but you would have to be a fool not to take advantage of the ability to insert assets seamlessly and with no friction into the American homeland through the southern border… if you’re sitting where Iran is, where China is, where Russia is.”


It would be really foolish for people whom America is at war with to not slip agents across an open border.

The problem here is: the fedgov doesn’t care if there are terrorist attacks. If anything, they want as many as possible, as it helps to justify their lunatic agenda.