Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Living together of persons in same-sex relationships “cannot be compared to the Indian family concept of a husband, a wife and children born out of the union” , Centre tells #SupremeCourtOfIndia #SameSexMarriage #LGBTQIA pic.twitter.com/zGgXTdb2NY
— Live Law (@LiveLawIndia) March 12, 2023
No fundamental rights violated due to not recognising same sex marriages : Centre tells #SupremeCourtOfIndia #SupremeCourt pic.twitter.com/pvK3BhSocU
— Live Law (@LiveLawIndia) March 12, 2023
Indians hate Chinese people. It’s a very extreme thing, going back like, presumably thousands of years. You could even make arguments from their own historical records that it goes back ten thousand years or more, though Western historians do not honor that history.
This hatred of the Chinese is why they’ve aligned themselves with the United States (even though they also have a certain hatred of white people due to the colonial history).
Soon, however, they are going to have to choose between their hatred of Chinese people and their hatred of homosexuals, because their United States allies are going to start putting the hard squeeze on them to go full faggot.
The US does this to all of their “allies” (which the US considers subjects and vassals). The US disregards strategic logic in order to force its allies to accept its social agenda. It would obviously make more sense to back off this “prime anus” thing while they are attempting to rally India against China, but the people who run America (Jews and women) can’t think that way.
The Indian government opposes recognising same-sex marriages, it said in a filing to the Supreme Court on Sunday, urging the court to reject challenges to the current legal framework lodged by LGBT couples.
The Ministry of Law believes that while there may be various forms of relationships in society, the legal recognition of marriage is for heterosexual relationships and the state has a legitimate interest in maintaining this, according to the filing seen by Reuters, which has not been made public.
“Living together as partners and having sexual relationship by same sex individuals … is not comparable with the Indian family unit concept of a husband, a wife and children,” the ministry argued.
The court cannot be asked “to change the entire legislative policy of the country deeply embedded in religious and societal norms”, it said.
In a historic verdict in 2018, India’s top court decriminalised homosexuality by scrapping a colonial-era ban on gay sex. The current case is being seen as a further important development on LGBT rights in the country.
At least 15 pleas, some by gay couples, have been filed in recent months asking the court to recognise same-sex marriages, setting the stage for this legal face-off with Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government.
…
In Sunday’s filing, the government argued the 2018 ruling cannot mean recognising a fundamental legal right to same-sex marriage under the laws of the country.
The intent behind the current legal system on marriage “was limited to the recognition of a legal relationship of marriage between a man and a woman, represented as a husband and wife.”
The government has argued that any change to the legal structure should be the domain of the elected parliament, not the court.
The cases are set to be heard in the Supreme Court on Monday.
India is on the brink.
They are on the rim, if you will.
The gay agenda has its poop-stained hooks in the country.
The US is not going to be happy they’ve rejected so-called “anal marriage” and they will begin their harassment operations immediately.
A decision will have to be made. Rejecting the US necessarily means aligning closer to the Chinese.
Personally, I will always side with whoever is not doing the gay stuff, on absolute principle, regardless of any other factor.
Because I am a Christian.
The Hindus will have to make their own decision:
Which way, Hindu man?
