Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Previously: Kamala Goes Buckwild in Europe, Gives Bizarre Answers at Press Conferences
Kamala is back in America and still acting very strangely.
What even is this?
RT:
US Vice President Kamala Harris has said that, by fighting Russia, Ukraine is defending the US-led NATO alliance in an apparent gaffe.
In a speech to the Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) winter meeting in Washington, DC on Saturday, Harris argued that Russia’s offensive in Ukraine “threatens not just Ukraine’s democracy” but “democracy and security across Europe,” as well as overseas.
“The ocean that separates us will not leave us untouched by this aggression,” Harris claimed, before seemingly suggesting that Ukraine is doing NATO’s bidding.
“So I will say what I know we all say, and I will say over and over again: The United States stands firmly with the Ukrainian people in defense of the NATO alliance,” she said.
However, the transcript of the speech released by the White House suggested that Harris misspoke with “and” being added before “in defense of the NATO alliance.”
“The United States stands firmly with the Ukrainian people and in defense of the NATO Alliance,” the transcript reads.
Well, the transcript can read whatever it wants to read.
But what she said is what she said.
Does Kamala Harris, our sitting Vice President, think Ukraine is a part of NATO?
— Benny (@bennyjohnson) March 12, 2022
The “and” wouldn’t really have made any sense, given that this was the punchline.
Understand: this was a scripted speech.
I mean, we hear about all of these staffing problems Kamala has had. Presumably, those staffing problems extend to her speechwriters.
A lot of people were confused when the media and government kept referring to the Ukraine as a “NATO partner,” as it was obvious that they were purposefully attempting to conflate this with “NATO member.” It seems very likely to me that Kamala’s speechwriters were some of the people confused by this purposefully confusing language.
But I don’t even understand why Kamala is all of a sudden center stage, when it is so well known that she is deeply hated by basically everyone on earth, and that she can’t even speak coherently.
I guess they just don’t have anyone else to send?
Typically, the Secretary of State, rather than the Vice President, would be doing these appearances. I deeply hated Mike Pompeo, and deeply resented the fact that he was involved in the Trump Administration, but whatever you want to say about him, he could speak coherently, and answer questions quickly and directly in a professional manner.
However, as we saw early on in the Brandon Administration, when Jewish rock star Secretary of State Antony Blinken was sent to a meeting with the Chinese, he quickly became befuddled and started stuttering and spewing bumper sticker slogans.
America is viewed as weak by the rest of the world under the Biden administration.
Putin is challenging Biden with live debate.
And at the Alaska Summit, China told Blinken how he views America. ⬇️⬇️⬇️— Rob Stark 🇺🇸🚚🚛🚚🇨🇦 (@starkrob21) March 19, 2021
His response to a direct, confident dressing down by the Chinese was similar to what the response of most of these foreign volunteers going to fight in the Ukraine are going to have when they start getting hit with Russian mortars.
So it’s possible that the reason Blinken isn’t being sent is that he is viewed as even less capable than Kamala Harris.
I guess if I was Joe Biden, I would probably make either Jen Psaki or Ned Price the Secretary of State, and send them out there as the face of this war effort.
At least they’re both capable of speaking normally, and answer questions with the correct gibberish in a calm and direct way.
I will say again: we don’t really have any idea who is in charge of this government.
It is looking more and more like no one is in charge at all, and these decisions are just being made by unknown advisors at the State Department and the intelligence agencies.
But I don’t even know that they are the ones making the decisions, so much as just providing the terrible advice.
Biden’s reluctance to ban Russian energy imports seemed genuine. Of course, it wouldn’t have been him that was reluctant – he’s an outright potato – but his immediate circle of advisors. Eventually, he cracked to pressure from Congress. I don’t think that was staged.
All of these people in Congress are either on the payroll of defense contractors or other corporations who perceive that they will benefit from this conflict, or they are obsessed with social signaling, or both. The role of the tech companies and media in this conglomeration of confusion shouldn’t be dismissed either – they are pushing this #IStandWithUkraine thing on people, using all of this atrocity propaganda and Hollywood movie style bullshit like the Ghost of Kiev and Snake Island to rile the masses of people into a frenzy over what amounts to a border skirmish in the former USSR that isn’t really any different on its face from the Chechen Wars or the Georgian War, neither of which any normal person in the West cared about, and most of them did not even know about. Of course, both of those conflicts were pre-smartphone, which basically means pre-female/soyman obsession with social media.
Biden cracked under the pressure and did the energy ban, and then went out there and blamed Putin for it, despite the fact that he clearly could have just not done it. (Or maybe Congress could have overridden a veto – I don’t know the exact numbers. Either way, he agreed to do it without Congress based on pressure from Congress and alleged public sentiment that was gauged by the number of Ukraine flags in social media profiles.)
The entire situation appears to be spinning totally out of control, frankly.
There is just simply no good reason why, if there was any secret competence in this government, that they would keep sending Kamala Harris out there like this. The only possible explanation is unfettered hubris and decadent incompetence.
