Rightists Protesting Drag Queen Story Hour Clash with Counter-Protesters in Boston

I’ve never heard of the National Social Club. It sounds like they could be labeled “neo-Nazi,” and I’ve had no good experiences with neo-Nazis. Well, actually, if you want to call skinheads neo-Nazis, I have had some good experiences with them.

But yeah – never heard of this group, so I’m not going to comment on anything about them, other than that I agree with their position on pederasty and homosexual pedophilia.

New York Post:

Three people were arrested in Boston after a group of masked white supremacists clashed with counter-protesters at a “drag queen story time” event for kids on Saturday, reports said.

One of the three arrested for disturbing the peace was reportedly the leader of the Nationalist Social Club, or NSC 131, which is categorized as a New England-based neo-Nazi group by the Anti-Defamation League.

The other two arrested were apparently counter-protesters who clashed with the 131 members in the Jamaica Plain neighborhood on Saturday afternoon.

The protests began outside an event at Loring Greenough House, with videos showing members of NSC 131 chanting and holding a banner that said “PEDO SCUM OFF OUR STREETS,” video of the protest showed. Members wore hats, sunglasses and masks emblazoned with “131,” according to the videos.

It turned out they were calling people within the LGBTQ community pedophiles,” witness Richie Cadet told WCVB-TV. “They definitely were saying certain words that should never be said about anybody.”

We are prepared and will not be intimidated in our work to make Boston a city for everyone,” Mayor Michelle Wu said in a statement provided to the Boston Herald. “We remain ready for citywide deployment of extra public safety resources with a zero tolerance approach to any groups looking to intimidate or harass residents in our city.”

Suffolk District Attorney Kevin Hayden called it an “organized white supremacist action” and said Boston was a “way point in the crusade of hate” launched in Charlottesville, Virginia five years ago during the infamous “Unite the Right” rally.

“The presence of white supremacists at a Jamaica Plain book reading today, like their downtown Boston march earlier this month, is at once a disgrace and a warning,” Hayden said in a statement. “Society everywhere is targeted by these groups, and society everywhere must reject them.”

Whether they are white supremacists or neo-Nazis or just normal right-wingers who are being a bit dramatic and ironic is irrelevant to the discussion. If they were in actual Nazi costumes, I would say “well, this looks like people trying to discredit the anti-homosexual movement,” but they were dressed in normal dox-resistant masks.

So, who knows. The point is, opposition to homosexuality, and in particular, homosexuality in schools, is not a neo-Nazi issue.

Typically, what is called “pedophilia” is either pederasty or homosexual child molestation, which is a form of recruitment.

I am against using the term “pedophilia” in most cases. Firstly, it was first brought into circulation after the Catholic Church homosexual scandal. The priests accused or convicted were being accused of normal homosexuality, which is pederasty.

Then they invented the concept of “heterosexual pedophilia,” which is a false concept. We have the writings of pro-pedophile writers from France (where this was legal and might still be), and they did have sexual interactions with female children, but they were primarily interested in young boys. One famous Jewish pedophile advocate in France said that both male and female children made up a “third sex.” This is to say that even people who molest female children are first and foremost homosexuals.

Also, homosexuals who molest pre-pubescent children are just trying to ensure the boy becomes a homosexual when he grows up. Stone Toss did a recent meme about this:

Mostly, homosexuals like pubescent boys between the ages of 11 and 14, which is what altar boys typically are. They just coined this term “pedophile” during the Catholic priest homosexuality scandal to protect homosexuals. It should have been called the “Priest Homosexual Scandal.”

Now the media has mixed in like, jailbait type stuff with the term “pedophile.” If you start saying “grass on the field, play ball,” people will accuse you of pedophilia because of arbitrary age of consent laws.

We’ve already explained this: An Intellectual Argument for Abolishing Age of Consent Laws

Anyway – I’m not going to go into the whole “no, I don’t support seducing 14-year-olds” thing. If you can’t understand the above link, I can’t help you.

Basically: just call them faggots.

Or call them pedophiles. Whatever. That’s their buzzword created to protect homosexuals, but okay.

What I will say: the problem is homosexualism and the social acceptance of homosexualism. Homosexuals grooming children is a direct consequence of socially accepting homosexuals, which is in itself a direct consequence of allowing women political enfranchisement, which is in itself a direct consequence of the English Civil War, which is in itself a direct consequence of Jews trying to get back into England.