Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Just a daily reminder here: we still have zero evidence that carbon dioxide causes the weather to warm on any scale that is measurable.
The greenhouse effect just simply does not play a major role in earth weather cycles. No one ever believed this before it was pushed by the United Nations for political reasons. “Climatology” is not a real science. I think people get it confused with meteorology or geology. It’s a literal fake science invented by the UN.
In fact, we have the ice core samples, showing that an increase in carbon trails weather warming.
Also, given that they’ve totally abandoned the idea that “cities will flood,” which was Al Gore’s argument 20 years ago, we don’t even know why warmer weather would be bad. An increase in carbon is certainly good for plant life.
This is all just total gibberish.
That’s why they have to ban you from talking about it.
Pinterest has announced plans to block all climate misinformation from its social network.
Image-focused Pinterest is predominantly used for sharing and finding home renovation inspiration, clothing, and beauty hacks. But it’s not immune from those who use the platform to make misleading, or blatantly false, claims about the climate emergency.
But, unlike other platforms (see: Facebook), Pinterest is taking responsibility for the spread of misinformation. It has pledged to remove all climate crisis denial-focused content from its pages. This includes anything that denies that climate breakdown has been influenced by human beings, as well as the misrepresentation of scientific data, and false information about solutions to the climate crisis.
Sarah Bromma, Pinterest’s head of policy, told the Guardian that Pinterest wants to “cultivate a space that’s trusted and truthful.” It is the only social media platform to regulate climate misinformation in this way.
The problem with climate misinformationLast September, Meta (then known as Facebook) announced new plans to counteract misinformation about the climate crisis on its platforms Facebook and Instagram. This included things like investing in misinformation prevention-focused organizations and producing video content spotlighting young climate activists.
But many still criticized Meta for simply not doing enough. And last November, two studies—one by the Center for Countering Digital Hate and one by the Institute for Strategic Dialogue—found that misleading information was still rife on Facebook.
Saying cow farts won’t blow up the planet is “hate”
They discovered that fewer than 10 percent of misinformation-centered posts were flagged as such. The posts referred to the climate crisis using words like “scam” and “hysteria.”
Climate denial posts are dangerous. The climate crisis is a very real and present threat, after all.
Human-caused greenhouse gas emissions—driven by animal agriculture, fashion, and the transportation industries, to name a few of the biggest culprits—are rising to dangerous levels. But time is still on our side.
According to the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, we can halve emissions by 2030. But only if industries take climate action now.
This is going to become standard.
No one gives a shit about Pinterest, and I was never even able to use the site at all. But it establishes a norm.
I don’t even know if they need to establish norms of censorship anymore – they’ve outlawed pro-Russian sentiment, without any explanation. Even if you believe the entire narrative about Evil Putin – how does people disagreeing with that on the internet hurt the innocent Ukrainian serial killers?
With Covid, they said that if you disagreed with the media, you were putting lives at risk, because people who didn’t take the vaccine because they thought it would give them diseases would die from the deadly virus. But Ukraine censorship – there is no explanation of a threat.
So if they say “climate denial is dangerous,” they can really just leave it at that. They don’t have to explain how you disagreeing with them is going to change the weather, when we live in a democracy, where the people have no ability to influence the government.
See how it all fits together?
