Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
September 5, 2016
This guy can genuinely use the argument “it’s my culture.”
Though he’s technically from India, where gay sex is less popular, it is difficult to argue that it isn’t a norm in his own country.
Keith Vaz today broke cover for the first time since he was exposed for paying rent boys for sex and went straight to Parliament as he defied calls to quit.
The Labour politician, 59, left his north London home with his wife of 23 years Maria Fernandes, who appears to be standing by her husband despite the alleged sex scandal.
Mr Vaz looked tired, and serious, as the couple spoke briefly as they got into a waiting taxi, which had already been loaded with suitcases.
The Leicester East MP was today told he is ‘not fit’ for office as 1,850 joined a Facebook group calling on him to quit immediately.
But in the face of hostile criticism it was business as usual for Mr Vaz, who was in the Commons this afternoon asking a question about Britons going off to fight for ISIS in Syria.
There was complete silence from MPs as he spoke to the Commons and congratulated Amber Rudd on being appointed Home Secretary, with some claiming he may still try to remain Chairman of the Home Affairs Select Committee.
Speaking in a calm voice with no hint of the scandal that has embroiled him, he referred to the case of Siddhartha Dhar, who was alleged to have appeared in a propaganda video released by ISIS after fleeing Britain in 2014 despite having been arrested six times.
…
The married father of two has been urged to ‘do the honourable thing’ and resign from Parliament after he allegedly paid male escorts to attend a sordid party at his London ‘sex flat’.
The Facebook group ‘P45 for Keith Vaz’ is filled with people calling on the MP to resign immediately.
He was secretly filmed.
Vaz is the longest-serving Asian British MP, and is often celebrated as an example of successful multiculturalism.
He has been a prominent-supporter of the multicultural dream, and has defended child traffickers.
Back in 2012, he came out in defense of Paki rape gangs, saying the issue was “not about race.”
From The Telegraph, May 9, 2012:
Mr Vaz, chairman of the Commons home affairs committee, said the “appalling” offences of the kind carried out by the gang needed to be looked into but it was important not to “stigmatise a whole community”.
He made the remarks after nine men from Rochdale were convicted for their role in a child sex ring.
Police and social workers have been accused of failing to investigate the gang for fear of being perceived as racist, allowing them to prey on up to 50 young white girls.
Assistant Chief Constable Steve Heywood acknowledged that officers could have dealt with the case “better than we did”.
But he denied that the girl’s complaints had been “brushed under the carpet” because officers were reluctant to confront the issue of race.
…
Mr Vaz told Today the offences committed by the gang were “absolutely appalling crimes”.
But he added: “Right at the start of this trial the BNP were outside demonstrating saying that this was a race issue. I do not believe it is a race issue.”
He said his view was backed by the police and children’s experts.
“What we need to do is to have a proper far-reaching, thorough investigation into these crimes and causes of these crimes.
“There are a lot of questions about the way in which organisations that have care of young girls have dealt with them and allowed them to be put into these positions.
“I think we do need to look into this but I think it is quite wrong to stigmatise a whole community.
“This is where it all ends up. It is already extending from ‘Pakistani men’ to ‘Asian men’.”
It’s called the “Nirvana Fallacy,” which you can read about on Wikipedia.
If Pakistanis wouldn’t have run this child-trafficking gang, White British men would have.
Just as if Naz hadn’t been soliciting rent boys, a White British man would have.
No one is ever responsible for anything and there certainly isn’t such a thing as behavior patterns within a group.
