We Must Secure Our Podiums: Lunatic BLM General Demands DC Military Junta be Made Permanent

Remember when we told you that the military in the Capitol would be permanent, and that the use of soldiers in law enforcement would spread around the country?

Well, there’s been a big step towards officially making the Capitol Junta permanent.

The lunatic Black Lives Matter “General” who Nancy Pelosi appointed to do a security review of the Capitol following the Capitol Storm has officially recommended a permanent militarization of the Capitol.

RT:

The US Capitol’s policing and surveillance measures are woefully inadequate, a security review launched in the wake of the January 6 riot concluded, calling for hundreds of new officers and a permanent barrier around the building.

Commissioned by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi following the Capitol riot and published on Monday, the security review pointed to major shortfalls at the complex and the surrounding National Capital Region, including issues with police staffing, training, planning and equipment. The review also found the facility itself could be improved with a permanent “mobile fencing option” to replace the temporary metal barrier currently ringing the Capitol.

“As the [temporary] fencing comes down, we recommend it be replaced with a mobile fencing option that is easily erected and deconstructed and an integrated, retractable fencing system in the long term,” the report said, adding that “Such a solution could enable an open campus while giving security forces better options to protect the complex and its members should a threat develop.”

Conducted over six weeks by a 16-member team led by retired Lieutenant General Russel Honore, the review also found that the Capitol police were “understaffed, insufficiently equipped and inadequately trained” during the riot, suggesting the force add some 854 new staff to remedy “personnel shortfalls.” The new hires would fill gaps for regular officers, intelligence specialists, operational planners, supervisors and trainers, among other roles.

That’s his name.

I keep calling him “general.”

He’s the guy who runs that outfit over there.

Pointing to a “slow and cumbersome” decision-making process for the Capitol police leadership, Honore’s team recommended the creation of a “quick reaction force” within the DC National Guard or a federal agency, which could be rapidly activated in the event of a crisis. Along the same lines, it also proposed a new “emergency authority” for the DC National Guard commander to deploy forces without authorization during “extraordinary” circumstances.

In addition to proposed remedies within police and security agencies, the review also said the Capitol itself must develop a “fully integrated” system of surveillance cameras, sensors and alarms, noting that the measures currently in place are somewhat disjointed and unable to operate in tandem. Visitors to the complex must be subjected to greater scrutiny with increased background checks as well, it said.

What is being described there is a high-tech police state machine. What is described is actually even more extreme than what is there now – which is pretty darn extreme.

This will protect the ruling elite from internet conspiracy theorists.

They are threatened by brutal masterminds like this guy:

Of course, as everyone reading this knows, and as I declared on the night of the event, the Capitol Storm was a complete and total setup.

I won’t disavow the patriots involved, as I think they were led into a trap.

But we know that the Mayor of DC demanded the police leave the city the day before the event.

We know that the cops had been pulled from the Capitol building almost entirely, ostensibly because of fake pipe bombs. (They still haven’t caught the guy! Despite his unique Nikes, they haven’t caught him! Shockingly similar to how they never caught the guy who sent anthrax to the government after 9/11!).

There were literally less than a dozen cops guarding the entire building, despite the fact that everyone knew there would be a massive protest that day, where people might get out of hand.

We know that the leaders of both the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers (the two groups that led the “attack” and are now charged with “conspiracy”) are both FBI assets.

We also know that the protesters were waved in by the cops, as the cops stood there by the door. There was a video of it, with the cops standing by the open door as people marched in and one of them saying “I disagree with it, but respect it,” apparently referring to orders he was given to open the doors.

That video was deleted as “disinformation,” even though the account, @disclosetv, is still up. This is the new world. Videos of real events that really happened are being mass deleted so the media can say something else happened. It’s more than just videos of Joe Biden having senior moments.

Thankfully, with this particular video, I wrote about it and included screenshots of the cop standing there, inviting people in.

Without even dissecting the event, we know that these people are now telling us that this is the new face of terrorism:

I’m old enough to remember when this was the face of terrorism:

So it’s especially jarring for me.

So what was the purpose of the setup?

Well, you’re looking at it.

It has served as a jumping off point for a redirection of resources towards a “white terror.”

It allowed them to ban Donald Trump from the internet as an aside.

Apparently, they are afraid that at some point in the impending future, they may have to worry about real mobs of people storming them, with a plan to do something other than take silly pictures.

Ultimately, they are going to start using robots to enforce this police state, because as they’ve made clear, they don’t trust the cops and police.

That might sound stupid or nuts or whatever, but I’m not the one who came up with the idea.

Remember the end of V for Vendetta? When the police put down their guns and let the people march toward Parliament, which V then bombed?

Well, robots won’t lower their guns, because they’re robots. They will just do whatever they’re programmed to do.

What is a Junta?

By the way, it came to me while on the train (whenever I have to take a train, I turn my phone off and think, and usually have many thoughts) that people probably don’t know what the word “junta” means.

People should know what the word is, as it precisely describes what is happening right now in Washington.

Well, firstly, the “J” makes an “H” sound. So you pronounce it like a black person would pronounce the word “hunter.”

Here’s the dictionary definition:

The first few sentences of “military junta” flesh things out a bit, including explaining why that “J” makes the “H” sound:

A military junta (/ˈhʊntə, ˈdʒʌn-/) is a government led by a committee of military leaders. The term junta means “meeting” or “committee” and originated in the national and local junta organized by the Spanish resistance to Napoleon’s invasion of Spain in 1808. The term is now used to refer to an authoritarian form of government characterized by oligarchic military dictatorship, as distinguished from other categories of authoritarian rule, specifically strongman (autocratic military dictatorships); machine (oligarchic party dictatorships); and bossism (autocratic party dictatorships).

A junta often comes to power as a result of a coup d’état. The junta may either formally take power as the nation’s governing body, with the power to rule by decree, or may exercise power by exercising binding (but informal) control over a nominally civilian government. These two forms of junta rule are sometimes called open rule and disguised rule.

Though this is a junta, this is not specifically a military junta, because the leaders of it are not military men. But it is the result of a council of people seizing control in a coup d’état (the election hoax), and they are using the military as a means to enforce their rule.

And it is certainly authoritarian. It is in fact the single most authoritarian government that has ever existed. It is also extremely militaristic in terms of outward facing military aims.

Introducing the word “junta” into your conversations with people about what is going on may prove useful.