Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
August 8, 2017
San Diego polling station, 2016
Presently, the states are cockblocking Donald Trump’s attempt to investigate voter fraud during the 2016 Presidential election.
However, while he is blocked, Judicial Watch is making headway.
RT:
US President Donald Trump has complained of “voter fraud” time and again, prompting critics to accuse him of paranoia. However, 11 California counties have more registered voters than eligible voters, according to a new report.
The discrepancies were found by Judicial Watch, a conservative foundation which says it fights for accountability and integrity in law, politics, and government.
The watchdog analyzed data from the US Census Bureau’s American Community Survey and the most recent California total active and total inactive voter registration records.
Through its analysis, Judicial Watch found that 11 counties had more registered voters than eligible voters.
San Diego County was found to have the biggest discrepancy according to the analysis, with 38 percent more registered voters than people who are legally allowed to vote. San Francisco County placed second, with 14 percent more voters.
Other counties were found to be in violation as follows: Imperial (2%), Lassen (2%), Los Angeles (12%), Monterey (4%), San Mateo (11%), Santa Cruz (9%), Solano (11%), Stanislaus (2%), and Yolo (10%).
However, Judicial Watch reported that Los Angeles County’s number is actually higher than the data analysis showed, with county officials telling the watchdog in June that it actually has 44 percent more voters than it should – making it the county with the largest discrepancy.
The watchdog said in its report that “California is failing to comply with the voter registration list maintenance requirements of Section 8 of the NVRA (National Voter Registration Act of 1993).”
Under the NVRA, states are required to “implement procedures to maintain accurate and current voter registration lists,” according to the US Department of Justice.
Judicial Watch has sent a letter to California authorities, warning them to clean up their act or face a lawsuit.
“It is urgent that California take reasonable steps to clean up its rolls. We will sue if officials fail to act,” Judicial Watch President Thomas Fitton wrote in the letter.
California is not the only state to have been called out by Judicial Watch. In April, the watchdog reported that 11 other states also had inaccurate lists of eligible voters: Tennessee, North Carolina, New York, New Jersey, Maryland, Kentucky, Iowa, Illinois, Georgia, Florida, and Alabama.
Of course, everyone knows that millions of illegal immigrants voted in the 2016 election.
Despite the weird claims that it didn’t happen, Barack Obama himself told illegals to vote, and claimed that if they did it would make them citizens.
He also told them there was no way that they could get caught.
The question was clearly about illegals voting, and he answered that they have a duty to vote and can get away with it without any risk of being charged with anything. If anyone thinks this is somehow selectively edited, here’s the original upload. If it was edited selectively, it was by the Mexican group that uploaded it.
At the same time as we have all of these discrepancies and the former President telling them to vote, the Jew media continues to act as though Trump is either paranoid, a liar or both for asserting that millions of them must have voted.
Even while they are making those claims, the states are refusing to turn over the data that the Federal government needs to complete their investigation as to whether or not illegals did vote.
“Anti-Voter ID Laws” is a Codeword for “Pro-Illegal Voting”
It’s going to be hard to figure out, even with the data, and certainly no individuals are going to get caught for it.
This is why we need voter ID laws. The only reason that anyone would be opposed to voter ID laws is that they want illegals to vote.
Their argument that blacks and Mexicans are simply too stupid to acquire an ID is retarded.
Some of these polling stations, you can literally just walk in and register by signing a piece of paper and then go vote. Which also means that people can be bussed around to different stations to vote, or vote in the morning and then again in the afternoon when the staff has changed shifts.
In the third world, they have “election ink” – they put ink on your finger that takes three days to wash off – to make sure that people don’t get bussed around.
Of course, in third world countries they don’t have massive immigrant populations with some of the immigrants being “citizens” and legally allowed to vote and some of them not.
HOWEVER – even though they don’t have that problem, most of them – all of them that I’m personally familiar with – still make you show an ID to vote. The reason they have to back that up with the ink is because they don’t have computer databases capable of keeping track of the IDs.