Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Volodymyr Zelensky gave a Bibi Netanyahu style address to a joint session of Congress on Wednesday.
Of course, he did it by teleconference, as he is currently still claiming to be in Kiev, which there is effectively zero chance is true. He’s been repeatedly asked to provide proof he is in the city, and every time he’s given very easily faked “proof.”
As there is no pressure to prove he is in Kiev, why would he be?
This is all so contrived.
I find myself looking back at the coronavirus hoax, and feeling it was a time of great reasonableness and honesty in comparison to what we have now.
RT:
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky spoke before the US Congress via video link on Wednesday, renewing his push for the imposition of a no-fly zone over the country amid Russia’s military offensive.
Zelensky delivered an emotional address, invoking some disastrous incidents in US history, including the Pearl Harbor attack and 9/11. His calls for a no-fly zone idea, however, have been repeatedly rejected earlier over fears that such a move would lead to a direct conflict between Moscow and the US-led NATO.
Why should he be able to invoke our national tragedies, as if he is a representative of our country?
Invoking 911 is worse than pretending to be Winston Churchill in front of the British parliament.
911 was done by his race, whereas Churchill fought a war to defend his race.
The Ukrainian leader was introduced by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-California), who said Congress has “great respect and admiration” for him. Pelosi concluded the introduction with “Glory to Ukraine!” a slogan commonly used by hardline Ukrainian nationalists, with Zelensky replying “Glory to heroes!”
And by “heroes” he means “baby-killing Jewish neo-Nazis.”
“To create a no-fly zone over Ukraine, to save people, is this too much to ask? Humanitarian, no-fly zone – Something that Russia would not be able to [use to] terrorize our free cities,” Zelensky told Congress, urging lawmakers to supply Kiev with anti-aircraft weaponry should they be unable to impose a no-fly zone.
Ukraine is in dire need of these weapons, Zelensky said, while mentioning in particular Soviet-made S-300 missile systems. Though he did not elaborate on where they could be procured, the systems are still used by several Eastern European nations.
“If this is too much to ask, we offer an alternative. You know what kind of defense systems we need, as S-300 and similar other systems. You know how much depends on the battlefield, on the ability to use aircraft. Powerful, strong aviation to protect our people, our freedom, our land,” he said.
Why would those not just immediately be taken out by the Russian surface-to-surface missiles? And how would they get them into the country in the first place? Hidden inside an aid convoy?
I don’t think you can hide that device in an aid convoy.
I guess they can get them over the Polish border into Western Ukraine, and fire them from there. But you still have the issue of them being easily wiped out by surface-to-surface missiles from Belarus.
Zelensky then presented a graphic video purporting to show the death and destruction caused by the Russian military. He also addressed his US counterpart, Joe Biden directly, urging him to be a true “leader of peace.”
“I see no sense in life if it cannot stop the deaths. And this is my main issue as the leader of the people, great Ukrainians, and as the leader of my nation. I’m addressing the President Biden: You are the leader of the nation, of your great nation. I wish you to be the leader of the world. Being the leader of the world means to be the leader of peace,” Zelensky said in English, concluding his speech.
Zelensky’s speech to lawmakers in Washington echoes his address to the Canadian parliament on Tuesday, during which he urged Ottawa to establish a no-fly zone. He appealed directly to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to use his “influence” to push through the controversial idea.
He got a standing ovation in Canada.
I’ve never seen a foreign leader lionized like this, and I don’t understand what the basis for it is. He is willing to send his people to be slaughtered – through mass forced conscription – while allowing Jews to leave? Why does that make him a hero?
Wearing a t-shirt while appearing before Congress is tacky and disrespectful. Even if he is in the trenches every day killing Russians, the idea that he didn’t have two minutes to throw on a shirt and jacket is idiotic.
Obviously, this is just a ridiculous and embarrassing marketing strategy.
Did you see where French President Emmanuel Macron did “steal his look” and went into work at Élysée Palace in a military hoodie?
That’s the logo of the French air force.
In my experience, French tend to be somber and cynical, by default. I can’t imagine the amount of wincing that this produced – “So are we at war now? You’re a big boy?”
It did make me wish, with all of my hard heart, that Joe Biden would start doing press conferences in a flak jacket, plates, and a helmet.
Zelensky is making the same demand to every country, which is a demand to shoot down Russian jets, and also to bomb missile systems inside of Russia and Belarus. That’s what “no-fly zone” means.
Russia would have to respond, which would mean shooting down NATO jets, which would mean Article 5. Article 5 does not have a caveat for “if NATO is invading and bombing another country when it is attacked, it doesn’t count.” Any attack on NATO, including an entirely defensive attack, triggers a war with Russia.
It is literally World War III. There is no other outcome of a NATO no-fly zone.
I don’t claim to understand the dynamics here. Zelensky is a puppet both of the US State Department and of the Jewish oligarchs of the Ukraine (all of whom are now in Israel – that’s mostly confirmed, but otherwise just obvious).
So, who wants this, exactly?
Some shills in Congress are calling for it, but they are all just on the payroll of arms companies, as you can see on opensecrets.org. Even Sean Hannity is not directly calling for a no-fly zone. Nor is anyone directly involved in the Biden Administration said to be considering it.
The only thing I can think is that Zelensky is dangling this out there as a way to prolong the conflict, by making the Ukrainians think that the calvary is on the way.
But maybe the State Department actually does want to launch WWIII?
I wrote a thing yesterday you should read if you missed it: Bloomberg Informs Dumb Retards That Saudi Selling Oil in Yuan is No Big Deal.
Basically, I have explained that right now is more or less the last chance at a shot of establishing the “end of history” one world order system, and the only way to do that is via launching World War III before the dollar collapses and the US no longer has the resources to fund its war machine.
I guess there is discussion about which way to go with this among the ruling elite.
Victoria Nuland, the Jewish neocon and wife of Robert Kagan, is Zelensky’s handler, and she and people like Adam Schiff are probably on the “just do WWIII” side of the issue.
Although initial polls showed that a majority of Americans support a no-fly zone – at 74%, according to Reuters on March 4 – when YouGov explained what the term meant, significantly fewer supported it.
In last week’s Economist/YouGov Poll, 45% of Americans said they approved of enforcing a “no-fly zone” over Ukraine, while 20% disapproved. This week, the share of Americans who support a no-fly zone has fallen to 40%, while the share who oppose it has risen to 30%.
But do Americans understand what enforcing a no-fly zone would entail, and if they don’t, would they support it if they did? Our most recent poll attempts to find out. It includes an additional question which defines a no-fly zone without using that name for it, rather than asking if people support the concept by name without a definition.
We find that when Americans are asked whether the U.S. military should shoot down Russian military planes flying over Ukraine, just 30% support the idea, 10 percentage points lower than the share who call a no-fly zone a good idea. And 46% of Americans oppose shooting down military planes, 16 percentage points higher than the share who call a no-fly zone a bad idea.
As always, polls have to be taken with a grain of salt.
But these seem to check out.
Americans are so low information, and the media so utterly dishonest, that it is believable that they don’t really know what a no-fly zone is.
Also, note that YouGov, when asking only “no-fly zone” without defining it, got 40% just days after Reuters claimed to get 74%.
That YouGov poll is now 10 days old, and I suspect that a larger number of people now know this means WWIII.
Frankly, the YouGov poll should have explained it as “triggering NATO Article 5 and putting the US and allied nations in a war with Russia, which China would likely also be involved in, something that most would define as ‘World War III.'”
It’s just the level of stupidity and disinformation is so high that most people have literally no idea what is even going on, and literally believe that Putin invaded the Ukraine for no reason other than that he is a mean person, and the only reason Joe Biden won’t stop him is that he is also a mean person.
This is getting weird. Hannity is coaching Trump throughout this interview and trying really hard to get Trump to say Putin is an enemy and evil pic.twitter.com/XHTzvS2emX
— Acyn (@Acyn) March 11, 2022
Vladimir Putin is an evil dictator that we should never trust and always be prepared for. pic.twitter.com/m3QJQcK71d
— Nikki Haley (@NikkiHaley) March 9, 2022
What does it even mean that a person is “evil in a general sense”?
I mean, when we talk about “evil,” we’re using it in a religious sense, often with relation to satanic pedophiles or satanic Jewish rituals.
But to describe a geopolitical adversary as evil is nonsensical.
Also, even in like, Marvel movies, the bad guys have motivations.
The media is presenting a children’s story about Vladimir Putin.
