Architect Banned from His Profession for Saying Jews are Not a Race

Peter Kellow – Victim of Jewish tyranny

You’re not allowed to have a job any more unless you have entirely positive views about a certain small Oriental tribe.

Daily Mail:

An award-winning architect has been struck off for claiming Judaism is not a race but a ‘cult’.

Cambridge-educated Peter Kellow called for ‘restraints’ to be placed on Jewish people including banning them from holding influential public office.

In a public Facebook post, he said there was ‘no such thing as the Jewish race’ and accused them of creating ‘resentment and suspicion’.

As a result of his behaviour, he was hauled before a disciplinary panel, found guilty of misconduct and kicked out of the profession after 47 years.

The Architects Registration Board hearing was told that Mr Kellow made the comments in April 2019, as then-Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn faced accusations of anti-Semitism.

One irony of this is that he might well have also been struck off the professional register for saying Jews were a race. Thilo Sarrazin, the German politician/banker who was keel-hauled after publishing his immigration-critical book Deutschland Schafft Sich Ab [Germany is Unmaking Itself], was also pilloried by the Jews for quoting one of their own articles arguing that Jews were indeed genetically distinctive.

The full text of the Facebook post is reproduced on the website of the Architects Registration Board as part of the finding against him.


“This business of “anti-semiticism” [sic] in the Labour party which is held up as racism. What is it all about really? Let us get a few thing [sic] straight. There is no such thing as the Jewish race. This is one of the many stunts that Judaists have pulled on non-Judaists who have swallowed it whole. There is only the religion/cult of Judaism and I never use the word “Jew” because that implies buying into the myth of racial commonality amoungst [sic] Judaists. The idea that members of Judaism throughout the world share a 3000 year old gene pool is plainly nonsense. II [sic] you look at their history just up to O AD there was plenty of racial mixing of the people called the “Jews” – not to mention the fact that they claim to originate from twelve tribes!! A DNA study of the population of Israel showed the Israelis to be mainly of Euroopean [sic] stock which is what you would expect. There is no doubt that Judaists have suffered from unfair and cruel treatment at many times in history but this was never racially motivated until the late nineteenth century and bloomed in the ideology of Adolf Hitler. Hitler used the myth of a Jewish race that the Judaists had invented against them. It is not far from the truth to say the Judaists were the inventers of European racism for they asserted they were racially different to the rest of us. Judaists have got themselves into a lot of trouble thougout [sic] history being subject to pogroms, ghettos and expulsions. I am not saying this was justified, but why do we see this consistent pattern? The Judaist myth makers would have it that this was racism. But racism as I have said is a recent phenomenon. Are the so-called “anti-semites”[sic] in the Labour Party simply “racists” as the popular narrative would have it? I doubt it. The problem people have and always have had with Judaism is not about race. It is because Judaism is a cult. What do I mean by a cult? A cult is a set of people, normally norminally [sic] unified by a religion or quasi-religion, who try to create a society within the general society. Judaism is far from being the only or even the most resented cult in history or the present.

Freemasonry is an obvious example and the suspicions that people feel towards it parallel closely those that some people feel towards Judaism. Mormonism, Scientology, and paganism are also cults. I would also include Sunni Islam in this list. Cults work against the interest of the general society as its members, in subscribing to a society within the society favour each other over the rest of us. This naturally creates resentment and suspicion. How can you trust such people? The liberal elite who rule us like cults as cults aid one of their central objectives – undermining the nation. So Freemasons, Judaists and Sunni Muslims become there natural bedfellows. Crucially liberals insist that these cults should be treated exactly the same as everyone else and any objection to this policy is anti-freedom or racist. So how should society deal with cults? How should society deal with people who through their cult activity weaken the bonds that the society needs to function well? First of all there is no question of banning them. I believe in freedom for the individual as a fundamental ideal and so if someone wishes to belong to a cult like Judaism or Freemasonry they must be free to do. But we must put restraints on their ability to create a society within a society. The main ones should be as follows

1. Registration of the cult in a public register

2. Registration of all adult members in a public register

3. No cult member can hold an important public office where they are in a position to descrimiate [sic] between cult members and non-cult members. For instance it is totally unacceptable lo have a Freemason or Judaist as a judge as their decisions will very like work in favour of fellow cult members. Their strong bond in their society within the society will ensure this

4. Whereas adults are free to choose to belong to a cult, the same cannot reply [sic] to their children. The assumption that the children of cult members will be ”born into” the cult is not acceptable in a civilised society. To this end, no cult can run its own “faith” schools

5. It must be against the law to wear cult clothing in public – except something worn on the top of the head like a hat [eg Sikh turbans or Judaist skull caps]. However, penalties will only be applied when a separate law [such as a driving evidence or bank robbery] is violated. We cannot have the police arresting people in the street for their clothing. Many will cry “attack on freedom” in the face of this new law but it is the opposite. It means cult members will not feel obliged to wear cult clothing in the street and in this way will be freer. The wives of Sunni men are an obvious example

As I mentioned, cults have become a flashpoint in the conflict between liberals and pro-nation sovereignists [sic] and so this is far from being a marginal issue. We must not hand the racist card to liberals when we criticise the activities of cults. By implementing sensible cult legislation [such as France already has] we can contain the problems of societies within our society and grant appropriate freedom to cult members”

The architect in question seems to have formed his opinion after reading Jew Shlomo Sand’s book The Invention of the Jewish People, which basically re-states what Ernest Renan had already pointed out in the 19th century, namely that Jews were mongrels and their claim to ethnic purity, and descent from the ancient population of Israel, was ridiculous. Though Jews tend to reject or discourage converts now, it was not always so. At various times, they have engaged in active proselytism and even forced conversion. Sand argued that most “Jews” today were descendants of Khazars, a Turkic people living in eastern Europe whose elites converted to Judaism sometime around the 8th century AD.

Jews are allowed to have these debates among themselves but if goyim dare to express an opinion one way or the other, they are professionally un-personed.

On his Crowdfunder page, Kellow points out the implications of his case.


This is the first time an architect has been subject to an accusation of violating Professional Conduct for an action that has not the slightest relation to professional conduct. It concerns an action that is trivial and inconsequential. So the whole concept of professional conduct has now been widened effectively to include every aspect of an architect’s life and covers every moment of it.

This is a test case and if ARB and the RIBA are successful then every aspect of every architect’s private life will be considered as professional conduct.

On this same page, he claims that he was a whistleblower for some kind of corruption and malpractice going on in the architectural association. He suspects that “anti-Semitism” complaint is retaliation for this. I haven’t delved into the details but it wouldn’t surprise me if one or more of the people involved in the malpractice was a Jew. It is a standard tactic for corrupt Jews to reach for the anti-Semitism card as soon as they are challenged. Harvey Weinstein did the same.

Soon we will have to apply to our local synagogues for a kosher certificate before we can get any form of professional employment.