Democrats Know They Have No Chance of Winning the Election

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
February 18, 2020

I’ve said from the beginning of the campaigns that the Democrats know they have no ability to beat the very popular incumbent president, and that the current plan of these people is to use the platform of running the campaign for the purpose of pushing their extremist narrative with regards to immigration, trannies, feminism, analism, anti-white hatred and everything else.

This has become increasingly obvious to the point that the media is having to admit that Democrats have accepted that they have no chance at winning.

The Hill:

Senate Democrats are privately acknowledging that President Trump will be very tough to beat in November if the economy stays strong and he draws on the substantial advantages of running as an incumbent.

Publicly, Democratic lawmakers are putting on a brave face, but behind closed doors anxiety is mounting over the unraveling of former Vice President Joe Biden’s White House bid and the failure of impeachment to put a dent in Trump’s approval ratings.

No one thought the impeachment would put a dent in Trump’s ratings. Everyone knew the opposite would happen, as he would be proved to be the victim he is constantly whining about being.

And I have a hard time believing that any serious person didn’t know Biden was going to collapse. He was always nonviable due to his senility and emotional instability, but the impeachment itself, which drew attention to his extreme scandals in the Ukraine, made the whole concept dumb.

One of the chief concerns is that Trump, who has a virtually uncontested path to the Republican nomination, will have a big head start to prepare for the general election.

His reelection campaign is already spending heavily to reach out to voters on Facebook, and the Republican Party is solidly unified behind him.

Meanwhile, Sen. Bernie Sanders’s (I-Vt.) victory in Tuesday’s New Hampshire primary has made clear to some Senate Democrats that the party’s primary is likely to drag on for months.

In particular, they worry the party will remain divided until the summer convention and fear a reprise of 2016, when lingering resentment among Sanders’s supporters over the Democratic National Committee’s favoritism toward eventual nominee Hillary Clinton dampened voter turnout in the fall.

They would of course have the option of simply giving the nomination to the popular candidate, which is Bernie Sanders. Of course they will do everything to avoid that, because they do not want their 2024 platform to be tied to Bernie Sanders’ platform of taking back all of the stolen money from Jews and corporations.

“I hear comments all the time that after what’s happened in the first two primaries we only have a 50-50 chance. It’s not looking good,” said a Democratic senator who requested anonymity to talk about the private concerns of colleagues.

One of the biggest surprises to lawmakers is the poor performance of Biden, who has performed well against Trump in hypothetical matchups.

Though Biden led his Democratic rivals in national polls over the past several months, he finished in fourth place in the Iowa caucuses, with 15 percent of the vote, and dropped to fifth place in the New Hampshire primary with a paltry 8 percent.

And yet Biden is still out there, riding into the sunset of the prairie.

May his soul find rest among the cactuses and tumbleweeds.

Others red flags are Trump’s resilient approval rating, despite months of an impeachment inquiry followed by a weeks-long trial, and the amount of money his campaign is raising and spending.

An analysis by The Guardian newspaper found that Trump spent nearly $20 million on 218,000 Facebook ads in 2019, far surpassing the leading Democratic candidates.

That dynamic has only begun to shift recently as former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg has spent more than Trump on Facebook and Instagram ads since Jan. 1.

Bloomberg has only recently emerged as a viable candidate, and some Democratic senators wonder how well a businessman who amassed tens of billions of dollars through a publishing company catering to Wall Street clients will play with the base.

They say they don’t like billionaires, but all evidence points to the fact that they do like billionaires just as long as the billionaires vow to change the weather.

A bigger problem for Bloomberg is that he’s old and from New York and no one is really very familiar with him. Furthermore, the blacks are familiar with him because the blacks follow this stuff with police, and blacks don’t like brutal cops, which is what Bloomberg is viewed as.

Bloomberg has just gotten approval to join the next debate.

So I guess we’ll have a better idea of where he stands after that. I’m not predicting much support beyond that which he’s already bought with ads. Though obviously, Biden dropping out will help him some.

Trump has also reported impressive fundraising numbers. The Republican National Committee and the Trump campaign said they raised $60.6 million in January and $525 million since January of last year.

The Democratic presidential field and the Democratic National Committee raised a combined $580 million in 2019, but much of what the candidates have raised has been quickly spent in the battle for the nomination.

Several Democratic candidates, including Biden, Sanders, Warren and Buttigieg, are beating Trump head to head in recent national polls, but the president had a small lead over every potential rival except Biden in Wisconsin, a key battleground state, according to a Marquette poll in December.

The chief worry among congressional Democrats is that if the party doesn’t settle on a nominee until the convention in mid-July, Trump will have a substantial organizing advantage.

If the media was not at war with Bernie Sanders, it would have already been solved. He is now the clear frontrunner.

“You hear everybody talk, ‘If we take all that time, how are they going to be able to get organized to combat what [the president] is doing?’” the senator said.

A second Democratic senator confirmed there is broad concern among colleagues over what they see as a difficult path to beating Trump, and stressed that is why it will be extremely important for everyone to embrace the eventual nominee, even if that candidate is viewed by some as too liberal or too moderate.

“It is a concern because we had such a bitter divide four years ago,” the senator said, referring to the misgivings Sanders supporters had over Clinton winning the nomination.

The lawmaker noted that the public has gotten used to what Democrats — and many Republicans — see as Trump’s outrageous behavior while the president has racked up a string of recent accomplishments, such as the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement on trade, a truce in the trade war with China and strong employment numbers.

“It’s given him a lot to talk about, and people have kind of become used to his misbehavior,” the second senator said. “I think everyone’s very nervous right now and that nervousness is contributing to this sense of, whoever wins [the nomination,] we’ve got to be there together.”

Publicly, some Democratic lawmakers insist they’re feeling optimistic after Iowa and New Hampshire, where Sanders, a candidate many of them view as less electable than Biden, tied for first and won outright, respectively.

“I love the fact that we had the highest voter turnout, I think, above 2008. That’s very exciting,” Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) said of the New Hampshire primary, where nearly 300,000 people cast ballots. “We’re just beginning the primary process but I think this is very positive.”

Turnout in Iowa, however, was below 2008 levels.

Stabenow acknowledged the picture is muddled heading into Super Tuesday on March 3. Asked to name the front-runner at this point, she responded, “I don’t think there is one.”

But she argued that fellow Democrats need to calm down.

“As usual, we as Democrats are always panicked. And it’s too early to panic,” she said.

Democratic lawmakers, however, were dismayed by signs that Trump’s approval ratings got stronger over the course of the impeachment process, which fired up the GOP base and failed to register as a priority among independents and swing voters — even though a large majority of them agreed with Democrats that new witnesses and subpoenas should have been considered at Trump’s trial.

Yeah, there was no way if the big Jews who plan these sorts of things wanted to win that the impeachment would ever have happened.

We already knew that impeachment boosted support for Bill Clinton, and he at least theoretically did something illegal (though it’s hard to say lying about an illicit sex act is a “high crime”).

When the wind blows low through the willows outside your window on one stormy night, forget me not, my princess.